Cited by 94Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCardiac Health and Mental Health

Measures of depression and risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Graham, Eva A, Deschênes, Sonya S, Khalil, Marina N, Danna, Sofia, Filion, Kristian B, Schmitz, Norbert·2020·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Depression is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes. This study aimed to determine whether the association between depression and incident type 2 diabetes differs by measure of depression.Methods Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, Web of Science Emerging Sources Citation Index and Conference Proceedings Citation Index, Cochrane Library, the University of York Center for Reviews and Dissemination, abstracts from the PsychoSocial Aspects of Diabetes conference.Inclusion criteria comparison of participants with and without depression, depression measured at age 18 or older, longitudinal follow-up with an outcome of type 2 diabetes, effect estimate adjusted for important confounders, full-text available in English or French, and study at overall low or moderate risk of bias. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality.Results Twenty-one studies reporting twenty-five effect estimates were included. Depressive symptom scales, clinical interviews, physician diagnoses, and use of antidepressants were all associated with an increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes. When all measures of depression were combined, the meta-analyzed risk ratio for type 2 diabetes was 1.18 (95% CI 1.12-1.24, I 2=45.4%). Results did not provide conclusive evidence that the association between depression and incident diabetes differs by measure of depression.Limitations Results showed heterogeneity and evidence of publication bias.Conclusions Results suggest that various measures of depression may be used to identify individuals at higher risk of type 2 diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.053

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 94

Authors
Graham, E. A., Deschênes, S. S., Khalil, M. N., Danna, S., Filion, K. B., & Schmitz, N.
Affiliations
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Jewish General Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Graham, Eva A
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
265
Pages
224-232
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000288006
Cited by
94
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PCG-155452)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
depression, type 2 diabetes, incident diabetes risk, depression measurement, clinical interview, physician diagnosis, antidepressant use, psychosocial risk factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review