Cited by 24Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The association of changes in repetitive negative thinking with changes in depression and anxiety

Open access
Hijne, Kim, Penninx, Brenda W., van Hemert, Albert M., Spinhoven, Philip·2020·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) is a common feature of different mental disorders in the affective spectrum. Most measures of RNT are disorder-specific and measure e.g. rumination in depression or worry in anxiety. METHODS: In the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA), 1820 adults completed the Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire to assess content-independent RNT over a 3-year follow-up period. We investigated the relative stability of content-independent RNT (Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire), over time as well as the association between changes in RNT and changes in affective disorder status (Composite International Diagnostic Interview) and depressive and anxiety severity (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Fear Questionnaire). RESULTS: In the total group, baseline RNT was strongly related to RNT three years later, while the difference between the scores at baseline and three years later was negligible. Increases and decreases in RNT were associated with the occurrence and recovery of affective disorders, respectively. Furthermore, changes in RNT between baseline and three years later were associated with corresponding changes in depression, anxiety, and avoidance symptom severity. These associations were small or negligible. LIMITATIONS: Our findings may not be representative of all affective disorders as individuals with an obsessive-compulsive disorder or bipolar disorder were excluded from our sample. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that RNT is not primarily an index of disorder status or epiphenomenon of symptom severity and may constitute a relatively stable transdiagnostic person characteristic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Repetitive negative thinking may put fathers at risk for suboptimal bonding either directly or as a precursor of psychological distress.

    “Repetitive negative thinking, as both a symptom of and transdiagnostic factor for depression and anxiety (Klemanski et al., 2017; McLaughlin & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2011; Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 2008), may also put fathers at risk for suboptimal bonding either in a direct manner or as a precursor of psychological distress (Ehring et al., 2011; Hijne et al., 2020; Spinhoven et al., 2018).”

    From Mindfulness, Self-compassion, and Psychological Wellbeing as Correlates of Paternal Bonding in Pregnancy. (2025) · cites this paper as Hijne et al., 2020

    The Introduction describes repetitive negative thinking as a possible vulnerability for psychopathology, and the discussion following Table 5 reports small or negligible associations between changes in repetitive negative thinking and depression or anxiety symptoms (page numbers unavailable). The paper does not study fathers or bonding, and its findings do not establish that repetitive negative thinking precedes psychological distress or directly affects bonding. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 24

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Martin, L.L., Tesser, A., 1996. Some ruminative thoughts. In: Wyer, R.S. (Ed.), Advances in Social Cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 1-47.

Authors
Hijne, K., Penninx, B. W., van Hemert, A. M., & Spinhoven, P.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Corresponding author
Spinhoven, Philip
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
275
Pages
157-164
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3042076533
Cited by
24
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
ZonMw
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
repetitive negative thinking, depression, anxiety, mood disorders, transdiagnostic traits, rumination, worry, avoidance, symptom stability, recovery from depression, NESDA
MeSH terms
Pessimism, Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Humans, Netherlands, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review