Psychological Predictors of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Outcomes for Anxiety and Depressive Disorders in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background By understanding specific differences between responders to a treatment and non-responders, treatment modalities may be fitted to the individual in order to increase effectiveness, a concept known as "precision medicine". This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated which pretreatment patient and family characteristics may predict the outcome of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in clinically anxious and/or depressed youth. In particular, higher symptom severity, more severe co-occurring anxiety or depression and more severe parental psychopathology were hypothesized to predict a worse CBT outcome. Methods The databases PubMed, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library were searched; 73 publications were included in the review from which 23 studies were used for the meta-analysis. Results Higher symptom severity represented a clinically relevant predictor of a worse CBT outcome, with large effects estimated by meta-analysis. Further, parental psychopathology was significant and detrimental for CBT outcome in anxious but not depressed youth, while the effects for co-occurring anxiety and depression remained unclear. The additional results of the review show that only few characteristics seemed to be clearly associated with a worse CBT outcome, namely worse coping skills and, restricted to depressed patients, more non-suicidal self-injury. Limitations The available evidence was of only moderate quality in general, further high-quality research with more transparent rep…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Meta-analyses and systematic reviews have described initial symptom severity, personality characteristics, heredity, childhood stressful events, neurophysiological markers, and genetic determinants as possible predictors of psychotherapy outcome in anxiety and depressive disorders.
“В метаанализах и систематических обзорах в качестве возможных предикторов исхода психотерапии тревожных и депрессивных расстройств описаны изначальная тяжесть клинических симптомов [7-9], личностные характеристики пациентов [10], насле дственность [8], стрессовые события в детстве [9], нейрофизиологические маркеры [9, 11], генетические детерминанты [9].”
From Positive-Dialogue Psychotherapy Outcome Predictors in Patients with General Anxiety Disorder and Mixed Anxiety and Depressive Disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 90 · Cited by 59
- Authors
- Kunas, S. L., Lautenbacher, L. M., Lueken, U., & Hilbert, K.
- Affiliations
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kunas, Stefanie L.
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 278
- Pages
- 614-626
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3089538135
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment outcome prediction, children and adolescents, anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, symptom severity, parental psychopathology, comorbid depression and anxiety, coping strategies, non-suicidal self-injury, precision medicine, family factors
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Psychotherapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review