A randomized, controlled trial assessing the acute efficacy of triple chronotherapy in unipolar depression
Abstract
Background Triple chronotherapy (wake night [one night without sleep], sleep phase advance, and early morning bright light exposure) demonstrated rapid efficacy primarily in bipolar depression, but has not been as well studied in unipolar depression. Our primary hypothesis is that triple chronotherapy is associated with a significantly greater Week 1 remission rate compared to the alternative protocol.Methods Unipolar depressed, nonpsychotic adult outpatients were randomized to triple chronotherapy or an alternative protocol (assigned sleep times without wake night, bright light exposure with blue-green wavelengths filtered out). Symptoms were assessed with Structured Interview Guide for Hamilton Depression Rating Scale with Atypical Supplement (SIGH-ADS) at each visit and a modified form (m-SIGH) daily for the first week. Response was defined as a 50% decrease in m-SIGH score, and remission as m-SIGH≤7, modified Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (m-CGI-I)≤2, and no depressed mood on m-SIGH.Results 44 patients (84.1% major depressive disorder, 75.0% persistent depressive disorder; 54.5% female; age mean±SD 38.3 ± 15.2 years) were randomized to triple chronotherapy (N = 22) or an alternative protocol (N = 22). Week 1 remission rate was numerically higher but not statistically significant in the triple chronotherapy versus alternative protocol group (25.0% vs. 6.7%, Chi-square=1.76, df=1, p = 0.294). m-SIGH scores and response and remission rates on Days 2-7 were numerically improved without reaching statistical significance in the triple chronotherapy versus alternative protocol group.Limitations Predominantly white, educated sample.Conclusions This small pilot study demonstrated triple chronotherapy's feasibility and tolerability in unipolar depressed outpatients. Larger randomized trials are warranted to further characterize acute and long-term efficacy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other control conditions such as low-intensity exercise and mild sleep/light management have been previously used.
“other control conditions such as low-intensity exercise and mild sleep/light management has been previously used (39, 40, 49).”
From Total Sleep Deprivation Followed by Bright Light Therapy as Rapid Relief for Depression: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 12
- Authors
- Yuen, L. D., Chen, Y., Stewart, J. W., Arden, P., & Hellerstein, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hellerstein, David J.
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 282
- Pages
- 1143-1152
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3117798118
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, sleep phase advance, bright light therapy, dysthymia, remission, chronotherapy, outpatients
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Phototherapy, Pilot Projects, Treatment Outcome, Chronotherapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review