Cited by 12Treatment of Major DepressionCircadian rhythm and melatoninBipolar Disorder and Treatment

A randomized, controlled trial assessing the acute efficacy of triple chronotherapy in unipolar depression

Yuen, Laura D., Chen, Ying, Stewart, Jonathan W., Arden, Peter, Hellerstein, David J.·2021·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Triple chronotherapy (wake night [one night without sleep], sleep phase advance, and early morning bright light exposure) demonstrated rapid efficacy primarily in bipolar depression, but has not been as well studied in unipolar depression. Our primary hypothesis is that triple chronotherapy is associated with a significantly greater Week 1 remission rate compared to the alternative protocol.Methods Unipolar depressed, nonpsychotic adult outpatients were randomized to triple chronotherapy or an alternative protocol (assigned sleep times without wake night, bright light exposure with blue-green wavelengths filtered out). Symptoms were assessed with Structured Interview Guide for Hamilton Depression Rating Scale with Atypical Supplement (SIGH-ADS) at each visit and a modified form (m-SIGH) daily for the first week. Response was defined as a 50% decrease in m-SIGH score, and remission as m-SIGH≤7, modified Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (m-CGI-I)≤2, and no depressed mood on m-SIGH.Results 44 patients (84.1% major depressive disorder, 75.0% persistent depressive disorder; 54.5% female; age mean±SD 38.3 ± 15.2 years) were randomized to triple chronotherapy (N = 22) or an alternative protocol (N = 22). Week 1 remission rate was numerically higher but not statistically significant in the triple chronotherapy versus alternative protocol group (25.0% vs. 6.7%, Chi-square=1.76, df=1, p = 0.294). m-SIGH scores and response and remission rates on Days 2-7 were numerically improved without reaching statistical significance in the triple chronotherapy versus alternative protocol group.Limitations Predominantly white, educated sample.Conclusions This small pilot study demonstrated triple chronotherapy's feasibility and tolerability in unipolar depressed outpatients. Larger randomized trials are warranted to further characterize acute and long-term efficacy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.174

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 12

Authors
Yuen, L. D., Chen, Y., Stewart, J. W., Arden, P., & Hellerstein, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Hellerstein, David J.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
282
Pages
1143-1152
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3117798118
Cited by
12
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
major depressive disorder, sleep phase advance, bright light therapy, dysthymia, remission, chronotherapy, outpatients
MeSH terms
Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Phototherapy, Pilot Projects, Treatment Outcome, Chronotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review