Cited by 6Cardiac Health and Mental HealthTreatment of Major DepressionAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Antidepressants and the risk of myocardial infarction among patients with diabetes: A population-based cohort study

Chen, Alice Chun-Chen, Huang, Kuan-Lun, Chen, Hong-Ming, Chen, Pau-Chung, Chen, Vincent Chin-Hung, Chiu, Wei-Che·2021·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Objective To investigate the impact of antidepressants (ATDs) on the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).Methods This was a retrospective population-based cohort study that used data obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. The study cohort included diabetic patients who were older than 50 years from 1997 to 2010. We then randomly assigned individuals to the matched cohort at a 1:1 ratio according to their demographic data. Both study and matched cohorts were followed up to compare the risk of MI between patients with and without ATD use from 2000 until the end of 2013. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the relationship between ATD treatment and the occurrence of MI.Results After adjustment for confounders, patients with ATD use of more than 180 days had a lower risk of MI than those without ATD use in the matched cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.71). The adjusted HRs of MI were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.73-0.81) and 0.56 (95% CI, 052.-0.60) in patients with DM and ATD use of 180 > cDDD ≥ 28 and cDDD ≥ 180, respectively. When the duration of ATD treatment was 180 days or longer, MI risk was significantly reduced (after adjustment) for all classes of ATD except bupropion.Conclusions Most ATDs, but not bupropion, were associated with significantly reduced risk of MI among the DM population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.078

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 6

Authors
Chen, A. C.-C., Huang, K.-L., Chen, H.-M., Chen, P.-C., Chen, V. C.-H., & Chiu, W.-C.
Affiliations
  • National Chengchi University (TW)
  • Ministry of Health and Welfare (TW)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • Chang Gung University (TW)
  • Fu Jen Catholic University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chiu, Wei-Che
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
294
Pages
109-114
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3179844576
Cited by
6
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
antidepressants, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular risk, bupropion, older adults, drug safety
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Myocardial Infarction, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Taiwan, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review