Cited by 17Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAnesthesia and Pain ManagementMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Association between neuraxial labor analgesia and postpartum depression: A meta-analysis

Wang, Jian, Zhao, Ge, Song, Guang, Liu, Jing·2022·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Labor and delivery complications, particularly pain, are important risk factors for postpartum depression (PPD). Neuraxial labor analgesia can effectively relieve labor pain; however, the association between neuraxial labor analgesia and PPD, if any, has not been established. Methods PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were searched. The incidence of PPD was the primary outcome. The secondary outcome was the difference in postpartum Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale scores between the neuraxial labor analgesia and control groups. Subgroup analyses and post-hoc meta-regression were performed. Results Nineteen studies with a total of 8758 parturients were identified. Neuraxial labor analgesia did not decrease PPD risk compared to the control group (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.58-1.23); however, after being stratified by PPD prevalence, neuraxial labor analgesia decreased the risk for PPD in the high prevalence (>14%) subgroup (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39-0.94) and increased the risk for PPD in the low prevalence ( Limitation Heterogeneity and a limited number of randomized controlled trials may bias the interpretation of the results. Conclusion Neuraxial labor analgesia had a protective effect when administered to parturients in the region with a high prevalence of PPD, but became a risk factor when administered to parturients in the region with a low prevalence of PPD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2022.05.095

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J., Zhao, G., Song, G., & Liu, J.
Affiliations
  • First Hospital of China Medical University (CN)
  • Sheng Jing Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Jing
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
311
Pages
95-102
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4280519203
Cited by
17
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
neuraxial labor analgesia, postpartum depression, labor pain, epidural analgesia, regional anesthesia, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, maternal mental health
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Analgesia, Epidural, Depression, Postpartum, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review