Cited by 8Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Resting-state connectivity and neural response to emotional images in patients with severe health anxiety: An fMRI study

Open access
Gehrt, Tine B., Macoveanu, Julian, Bailey, Christopher J., Fisher, Patrick M., Pallesen, Karen Johanne, Frostholm, Lisbeth·2023·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe health anxiety is a disorder characterized by a persistent preoccupation with one's health. In behavioral studies, biases in the processing of health-related stimuli (e.g., pictures, words) are consistently associated with health anxiety symptoms. The neural correlates of the observed behavioral abnormalities remain however poorly understood. METHODS: In this functional magnetic resonance imaging study, 22 treatment-seeking patients with severe health anxiety and 22 control participants performed a resting-state and a picture matching task. Immediately after the resting-state, participants completed a questionnaire quantifying their thoughts and feelings during rest along several dimensions. The picture task included images of health-related and neutral scenes and of disgusted and neutral faces. RESULTS: Compared to controls, patients with health anxiety showed increased functional connectivity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex within the left fronto-parietal resting-state network, which correlated positively with the self-reported thought dimensions of Self, Health Concern, and Thought Suppression. In the picture matching task, no significant group differences were found in the hypothesised regions (amygdala and insula) or at a whole-brain level in response to either health-related versus neural scenes or disgust versus neutral faces contrasts. LIMITATIONS: A relatively small sample size and that no information about patients declining to participate was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that behavioral biases in health anxiety may be related to aberrant left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex functional connectivity at rest. In contrast, the health anxiety patients did not show significant hyperactivations of amygdala and insula during processing of emotional stimuli, contrasting findings in other anxiety disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.138

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Further cognitive constructs related to health anxiety include higher levels of anxiety sensitivity, health-related rumination, and health-related intolerance of uncertainty.

    “Further cognitive constructs related to health anxiety include higher levels of anxiety sensitivity, the fear of arousal-related bodily sensations [50, 51], health-related rumination [52], and health-related intolerance of uncertainty which is essentially a reduced capacity to endure the perception of missing important information [53–55].”
  • A recent study found no differences in amygdala activity or any brain activity between patients with health anxiety and healthy controls when exposed to health-related pictures.

    “In contrast, a recent study found no differences in amygdala activity or any brain activity between patients with health anxiety and healthy controls when exposed to health-related pictures [55].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 8

Authors
Gehrt, T. B., Macoveanu, J., Bailey, C. J., Fisher, P. M., Pallesen, K. J., & Frostholm, L.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Gehrt, Tine B.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
324
Pages
370-378
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313288478
Cited by
8
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (DNRF89)
  • Independent Research Fund Denmark (9037-00015B9)
  • Illum Fondet (03061023)
  • Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region
  • Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
  • Jascha Fonden (5581)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
health anxiety, resting-state functional connectivity, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, frontoparietal network, thought suppression, health concerns, amygdala, insula, emotional face processing, disgust, cognitive biases
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Brain, Emotions, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review