Cited by 17Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Functioning in patients with major depressive disorder in remission: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Schwarz, Rasmus, Munkholm, Klaus, Christensen, Mie S., Kessing, Lars V., Vinberg, Maj·2024·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the leading causes of burden of disease globally. We aimed to investigate whether global functioning is impaired in patients with MDD in full or partial remission compared to healthy control individuals (HC).Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA guideline. We searched the databases PubMed, EMBASE and PsycINFO from January 1st 1980 to February 1st 2023. We included studies of adults with a diagnosis/former diagnosis of MDD with assessment of global functioning performed during a state of full or partial remission. The methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist. Standardised mean differences (SMD) using random-effects models were calculated as the summary measure. We further performed meta-analyses of the mean raw score in patients with MDD for individual functioning scales.Results Forty-two studies, comprising 17,999 patients with MDD and 35,550 HC, were included, 14 of which included both patients with MDD in full or partial remission and HC. Global functioning was lower in patients with MDD in full or partial remission compared with HC (SMD -2.00, 95 % CI: -0.9 to -3.03, 15 comparisons, I 2: 99.8 %).Limitations Important information about the study participants and setting was not reported for most studies, or the reporting was unclear.Conclusion Patients with MDD have lower levels of functioning compared with HC also when in full or partial remission. Assessment of functioning should be an essential component of managing patients with MDD, also during remission.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.054

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 17

Authors
Schwarz, R., Munkholm, K., Christensen, M. S., Kessing, L. V., & Vinberg, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Mental Health Services (DK)
Corresponding author
Schwarz, Rasmus
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-10
Volume
363
Pages
112-123
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400743343
Cited by
17
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Capital Region of Denmark Mental Health Services
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
major depressive disorder, remission, global functioning, functional disability, partial remission, functioning assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Remission Induction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review