Functioning in patients with major depressive disorder in remission: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the leading causes of burden of disease globally. We aimed to investigate whether global functioning is impaired in patients with MDD in full or partial remission compared to healthy control individuals (HC).Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA guideline. We searched the databases PubMed, EMBASE and PsycINFO from January 1st 1980 to February 1st 2023. We included studies of adults with a diagnosis/former diagnosis of MDD with assessment of global functioning performed during a state of full or partial remission. The methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist. Standardised mean differences (SMD) using random-effects models were calculated as the summary measure. We further performed meta-analyses of the mean raw score in patients with MDD for individual functioning scales.Results Forty-two studies, comprising 17,999 patients with MDD and 35,550 HC, were included, 14 of which included both patients with MDD in full or partial remission and HC. Global functioning was lower in patients with MDD in full or partial remission compared with HC (SMD -2.00, 95 % CI: -0.9 to -3.03, 15 comparisons, I 2: 99.8 %).Limitations Important information about the study participants and setting was not reported for most studies, or the reporting was unclear.Conclusion Patients with MDD have lower levels of functioning compared with HC also when in full or partial remission. Assessment of functioning should be an essential component of managing patients with MDD, also during remission.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Each relapse/recurrence is associated with an increased risk of future recurrence, as well as reduced quality-of-life and functioning.
“Each relapse/recurrence is associated with an increased risk of future recurrence, 11 as well as reduced quality-of-life 12 and functioning. 13”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 17
- Authors
- Schwarz, R., Munkholm, K., Christensen, M. S., Kessing, L. V., & Vinberg, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Mental Health Services (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Schwarz, Rasmus
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-10
- Volume
- 363
- Pages
- 112-123
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4400743343
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Capital Region of Denmark Mental Health Services
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, remission, global functioning, functional disability, partial remission, functioning assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Remission Induction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review