Cited by 10Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAnesthesia and Pain ManagementMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Anesthesia for cesarean delivery and subsequent depression: A nationwide retrospective cohort study

Chen, Yi-Chen, Liang, Fu-Wen, Ho, Chung-Han, Chang, Ying-Jen, Hung, Kuo-Chuan, Chu, Chin-Chen, Chen, Jen-Yin, Yu, Chia-Hung·2024·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Postpartum depression is a major psychiatric disorder associated with maternal suicide and child developmental disturbances. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether general anesthesia for cesarean delivery is associated with a higher rate of new-onset depression after delivery than neuraxial anesthesia. Methods This is a nationwide retrospective cohort study using data retrieved from the National Health Insurance Research Database between 2014 and 2018. Women who had cesarean delivery under general or neuraxial anesthesia were enrolled. After 1:4 propensity score matching, there were 4544 and 18,176 women under the general and neuraxial anesthesia groups, respectively. The primary outcome was new-onset depression diagnosed after delivery in a time-to-event analysis setting. Results After propensity-score matching, the rate of new-onset depression diagnosed within 1 year was 1.10 % (50/4488) and 0.86 % (157/18176) after cesarean delivery under general and neuraxial anesthesia, respectively. For depression diagnosed within 90 days of delivery, significant difference between the two groups was noted (0.51 % vs. 0.30 %, P = 0.031). In the time-to-event analysis with Cox regression model, women who delivered under general anesthesia were associated with significantly higher risk of postpartum depression within 90 days (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.71; 95 % CI, 1.05-2.79) compared with those under neuraxial anesthesia. Limitations The observational design only allows asse…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.147

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Y.-C., Liang, F.-W., Ho, C.-H., Chang, Y.-J., Hung, K.-C., Chu, C.-C., Chen, J.-Y., & Yu, C.-H.
Affiliations
  • Chi Mei Medical Center (TW)
  • Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
Corresponding author
Yu, Chia-Hung
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
364
Pages
108-115
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401329566
Cited by
10
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Chi Mei Medical Center (CMFHR112024)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
cesarean section, postpartum depression, general anesthesia, neuraxial anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, postoperative depression, maternal mental health, anesthetic risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Anesthesia, General, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Cesarean Section, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Taiwan, Proportional Hazards Models, Depression, Postpartum, Propensity Score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review