Practice paper of the American Dietetic Association: individualized nutrition approaches for older adults in health care communities
Abstract
It is the position of the American Dietetic Association that the quality of life and nutritional status of older adults residing in health care communities can be enhanced by individualization to less-restrictive diets. The Association advocates the use of qualified registered dietitians (RDs) to assess and evaluate the need for nutrition care according to each person's individual medical condition, needs, desires, and rights. Dietetic technicians, registered, provide support to RDs in the assessment and implementation of individualized nutrition care. Individual rights and freedom of choice are important components of the assessment process. An RD must assess each older adult's risks vs benefits for therapeutic diets. Older adults select housing options that provide a range of services from minimal assistance to 24-hour skilled nursing care. Food is an important part of any living arrangement and an essential component for quality of life. A therapeutic diet that limits seasoning options and food choices can lead to poor food and fluid intake, resulting in undernutrition and negative health effects. Including older individuals in decisions about food can increase the desire to eat and improve quality of life. The expansion of health care communities creates a multitude of options for RDs and dietetic technicians, registered, to promote the role of good food and nutrition in the overall quality of life for the older adults they serve.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Meals tailored to a person's culture, preferences, and personal goals may increase quality of life, satisfaction with meals, and nutrition status.
“Meals tailored to a person's culture, preferences, and personal goals may increase quality of life, satisfaction with meals, and nutrition status (127).”
From 13. Older Adults: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [127]
Meals tailored to a person's culture, preferences, and personal goals may increase quality of life, satisfaction with meals, and nutrition status.
“Meals tailored to a person’s culture, preferences, and personal goals may increase quality of life, satisfaction with meals, and nutrition status (165).”
From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [165]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 95
- Authors
- Dorner, B.
- Corresponding author
- Dorner, Becky
- Venue
- Journal of the American Dietetic Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1554-1563
- ISSN
- 0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067900961
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 13.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Keywords
- older adults, dietary therapy, registered dietitians, dietetic technicians, nutritional status, quality of life, malnutrition, food and fluid intake, patient autonomy, dietary assessment, long-term care
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Chronic Disease, Community Health Services, Dietetics, Female, Health Services for the Aged, Health Status, Humans, Male, Nutritional Requirements, Nutritional Status, Quality of Life, United States, Nutrition Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review