Cited by 211Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

Prevalence of partner violence in same-sex romantic and sexual relationships in a national sample of adolescents

HALPERN, C, YOUNG, M, WALLER, M, MARTIN, S, KUPPER, L·2004·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

Purpose To present the first national prevalence estimates of psychological and physical intimate partner violence between adolescents in same-sex relationships.Methods Analyses focus on 117 adolescents aged 12-21 years (50% female) from Wave II of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health who reported exclusively same-sex romantic or sexual relationships in the 18 months before interview. Items from the Conflict Tactics Scale were used to measure partner violence victimization. Data analysis included computation of prevalence estimates and a logistic regression analysis to assess associations between sociodemographic characteristics and violence victimization.Results Almost one-quarter of adolescents with same-sex romantic or sexual partners reported some type of partner violence victimization; about 1 in 10 reported physical victimization. Significant sex differences were found (OR = .29, CI = 0.08, 1.00), with males being less likely than females to report "any violence." Of six other sociodemographic characteristics examined, importance of religion (OR = .27, CI = 0.07-1.07) and school size (OR = .32, CI = 0.09-1.11) were associated with victimization at the p < .10 level. Adolescents who reported that religion was important to them and adolescents who attended larger schools were at lower risk of "any violence."Conclusions As with opposite-sex relationships, psychological and minor physical violence victimization is common among adolescents involved in same-sex intimate relationships. Males reporting exclusively same-sex relationships were less likely than females to report experiencing the violence behaviors examined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1054-139x(03)00345-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 50 highest-quality risky sexual activity studies, 42 (84%) reported inverse relationships and none found a positive one.

    “Of the 50 highest quality studies, 42 (84%) reported inverse relationships [333–343] and none found a positive one.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 211

Authors
HALPERN, C., YOUNG, M., WALLER, M., MARTIN, S., & KUPPER, L.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
HALPERN, C
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-08
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
124-131
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132519396
Cited by
211
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 17
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R49-CCR-402-444)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01- HD31921, P01HD031921)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
intimate partner violence, same-sex relationships, psychological violence, physical violence, school size, sociodemographic risk factors, Add Health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Data Collection, Female, Homosexuality, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Sexual Partners, United States, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Domestic Violence, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review