Prevalence of partner violence in same-sex romantic and sexual relationships in a national sample of adolescents
Abstract
Purpose To present the first national prevalence estimates of psychological and physical intimate partner violence between adolescents in same-sex relationships.Methods Analyses focus on 117 adolescents aged 12-21 years (50% female) from Wave II of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health who reported exclusively same-sex romantic or sexual relationships in the 18 months before interview. Items from the Conflict Tactics Scale were used to measure partner violence victimization. Data analysis included computation of prevalence estimates and a logistic regression analysis to assess associations between sociodemographic characteristics and violence victimization.Results Almost one-quarter of adolescents with same-sex romantic or sexual partners reported some type of partner violence victimization; about 1 in 10 reported physical victimization. Significant sex differences were found (OR = .29, CI = 0.08, 1.00), with males being less likely than females to report "any violence." Of six other sociodemographic characteristics examined, importance of religion (OR = .27, CI = 0.07-1.07) and school size (OR = .32, CI = 0.09-1.11) were associated with victimization at the p < .10 level. Adolescents who reported that religion was important to them and adolescents who attended larger schools were at lower risk of "any violence."Conclusions As with opposite-sex relationships, psychological and minor physical violence victimization is common among adolescents involved in same-sex intimate relationships. Males reporting exclusively same-sex relationships were less likely than females to report experiencing the violence behaviors examined.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Of the 50 highest-quality risky sexual activity studies, 42 (84%) reported inverse relationships and none found a positive one.
“Of the 50 highest quality studies, 42 (84%) reported inverse relationships [333–343] and none found a positive one.”
From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [333]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 211
- Authors
- HALPERN, C., YOUNG, M., WALLER, M., MARTIN, S., & KUPPER, L.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- HALPERN, C
- Venue
- Journal of Adolescent Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 124-131
- ISSN
- 1054-139X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132519396
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R49-CCR-402-444)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01- HD31921, P01HD031921)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Keywords
- intimate partner violence, same-sex relationships, psychological violence, physical violence, school size, sociodemographic risk factors, Add Health
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Data Collection, Female, Homosexuality, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Sexual Partners, United States, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Domestic Violence, Crime Victims
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review