The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
173. Does Immediate Access to Birth Control Help Prevent Pregnancy? A Comparison of Onsite Provision Versus Off-Campus Referral for Contraception at Two School-Based Clinics
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Two studies87,97 investigated this question with internal comparisons, and both found onsite access to contraceptives associated with increased contraceptive uptake and reduced pregnancy rates.”
From School-Based Health Centers to Advance Health Equity (2016) · cites this paper as [87]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 14 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, P., Novello, G., & Chacko, M.
- Affiliations
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- ORCID
- Chacko, Mariam
- Venue
- Journal of Adolescent Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- S107-S108
- ISSN
- 1054-139X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1553637676
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Keywords
- hormonal contraception, school-based health centers, contraception, adolescent pregnancy, contraceptive access, high school students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
