A Systematic Review of Youth and Teen Mental Health First Aid: Improving Adolescent Mental Health
Abstract
Purpose Adolescent mental illness often goes undetected. Youth and teen Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) are variations of adult MHFA that aims to help adults and adolescents recognize the signs and provide help where appropriate. We conducted a systematic review to summarize the current evidence for youth and teen MHFA, providing direction for future training and research.Methods A systematic search was performed on September 12, 2020 on PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Cochrane using keywords related to teen or youth MHFA, adolescents, and mental health. A narrative synthesis was then carried out.Results Of the 695 articles identified, 14 studies were included. All studies were from the U.S. and Australia. All studies demonstrated significant improvements in knowledge, recognition, stigmatizing attitudes, confidence, helping intentions, and helping behavior in both adult and youth participants. Improvement in knowledge and confidence was most reported, and improvement in helping behavior was the least reported. There is encouraging evidence of long-term benefits after the training.Conclusions More studies need to be conducted in non-Western countries, high-risk populations, and different professional settings. Future interventions could also consider different modes of learning, longer-term follow-up, and the measurement of outcomes that evaluate the quality of helping behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For youth, six studies measured stigmatising attitudes, four reported significant effects, again with inconsistent results at the item level.
“For youth, six studies measured stigmatising attitudes, four of which reported significant effects, again with inconsistent results at the item level.”
From The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health (2022) · cites this paper as [128]
Among adolescents, three of four studies measuring stigmatising attitudes found a significant reduction after Mental Health First Aid training, but results were inconsistent at the item level.
“Among adolescents, three of four studies that measured stigmatising attitudes found a significant reduction after training, but results were inconsistent at the item level.”
From The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health (2022) · cites this paper as [128]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 55
- Authors
- Ng, S. H., Tan, N. J. H., Luo, Y., Goh, W. S., Ho, R., & Ho, C. S. H.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Ho, Roger
- Venue
- Journal of Adolescent Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-210
- ISSN
- 1054-139X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3105486608
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Keywords
- adolescent mental health, mental health literacy, stigma, helping behavior, helping intentions, training effectiveness, long-term follow-up
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Australia, Mental Disorders, First Aid, Humans, Mental Health, Social Stigma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review