The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are Youth Sexting Rates Still on the Rise? A Meta-analytic Update
Abstract
A meta-analysis of 39 studies (110,380 participants) from 2009 to 2015 indicated that youth sexting increased over time. To inform current practice and policy initiatives, this meta-analytic update of studies since 2016 examined if rates of youth sexting have continued to rise and whether youth sexting differs by age, sex, sexting methods, and geographical location. Electronic searches were conducted in March 2020 in Embase, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Web of Science, yielding 1,101 nonduplicate records. Studies were included if they provided prevalence of youth sexting and data collection occurred ≥2016. Literature review and data extraction were conducted by following established PRISMA guidelines. All relevant data were extracted by two independent reviewers. To calculate mean prevalence rates, random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. Twenty-eight studies (N = 48,024) met inclusion criteria. The estimated pooled prevalence rates were as follows: (1) sending (19.3%), (2) receiving (34.8%), and (3) forwarding sexts without consent (14.5%). These prevalence rates are statistically similar to studies with data collected before 2016. In recent studies, females receive sexts at a higher rate than males, older youth are more likely to send sexts, and younger and older adolescents receive sexts at similar rates. Youth sexting rates have likely plateaued. Sexting education initiatives should begin early and encourage safe, ethical, and respectful online behavior.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“with recent meta-analyses indicating a prevalence of 14.5% (Mori et al., 2022).”
From Online Sexual Harassment Perpetration Among Peer Adolescents: A Cross-National and Cross-Gender Study (2025) · cites this paper as Mori et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“Mori et al. (2022), for instance, found no gender differences in the perpetration of different forms of online sexual harassment among adolescents.”
From Online Sexual Harassment Perpetration Among Peer Adolescents: A Cross-National and Cross-Gender Study (2025) · cites this paper as Mori et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“These figures are consistent with those reported in other international studies (Mori et al., 2022), although they are slightly lower than those found by other studies conducted in Italy (Morelli et al., 2020).”
From Online Sexual Harassment Perpetration Among Peer Adolescents: A Cross-National and Cross-Gender Study (2025) · cites this paper as Mori et al., 2022
Citations
Cites
Hoy, D., Brooks, P., Woolf, A., Blyth, F., March, L., Bain, C., Baker, P., Smith, E., & Buchbinder, R. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.014 · Cited by 2,555
Sanderson, S., Tatt, I. D., & Higgins, J. P. (2007) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dym018 · Cited by 1,531
(2018) · Cited by 900
Imran, N., Zeshan, M., & Pervaiz, Z. (2020) · Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.12669/pjms.36.covid19-s4.2759 · Cited by 540
Prevalence of Multiple Forms of Sexting Behavior Among Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Madigan, S., Ly, A., Rash, C. L., Van Ouytsel, J., & Temple, J. R. (2018) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5314 · Cited by 519
Self-citationMachimbarrena, J. M., Calvete, E., Fernández-González, L., Álvarez-Bardón, A., Álvarez-Fernández, L., & González-Cabrera, J. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15112471 · Cited by 273
The Prevalence of Sexting Behaviors Among Emerging Adults: A Meta-Analysis
Mori, C., Cooke, J. E., Temple, J. R., Ly, A., Lu, Y., Anderson, N. J., Rash, C. L., & Madigan, S. L. (2020) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-020-01656-4 · Cited by 262
Self-citationPrevalence and Association of Sexting and Online Sexual Victimization Among Spanish Adults
Gámez‐Guadix, M., Almendros, C., Borrajo, E., & Calvete, E. (2015) · Sexuality Research and Social Policy · doi:10.1007/s13178-015-0186-9 · Cited by 249
“Sexting” and adult romantic attachment
Weisskirch, R. S., & Delevi, R. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.008 · Cited by 244
Dir, A. L., Coskunpinar, A., Steiner, J., & Cyders, M. (2013) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0545 · Cited by 211
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Alonso, 2019, Sexting behaviours in adolescents: Personality predictors and psychosocial outcomes in a one-year follow-up, Ann Psychol, 35, 214
- Ayala, 2019, Sociocultural and psychological factors affecting sexting: A transcultural study, Rev Educ, 384, 169
- Dowdell, 2017, Self exploitation behaviors and sexting among high school students, Nurs Res, 66, E134
- Orme, 2016, Section 3: Nurses and health advisors oral presentations, Sex Transm Infect, 92, A17
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Media and Youth Mental Health
Weigle, P. E., & Shafi, R. M. A. (2024) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-023-01478-w · Cited by 135
A commentary on sexting, sextortion, and generative AI : Risks, deception, and digital vulnerability
Pater, J., McDaniel, B. T., Nova, F. F., Drouin, M., O'Connor, K., & Zytko, D. (2025) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.13152 · Cited by 11
Durán-Guerrero, E., & Sánchez-Jiménez, V. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-07241-5 · Cited by 8
Teachers vs. Chat GPT: identifying and naming acts of online sexual abuse
Dolev-Cohen, M., & Henry, N. (2025) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2025.2492585 · Cited by 8
“Research shows that sexting is prevalent among adolescents (Molla-Esparza et al., 2023; Mori et al., 2022).”
Durán-Guerrero, E., Nocentini, A., Menesini, E., & Sánchez-Jiménez, V. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15070969 · Cited by 2
“Within these dynamics, social networking sites have emerged as significant allies, enhancing communication and flirtation among peers, along with the exchange of sexual content and self-exploration (Mori et al., 2022).”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Mori, C., Park, J., Temple, J. R., & Madigan, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
- Corresponding author
- Madigan, Sheri
- Venue
- Journal of Adolescent Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-04
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 531-539
- ISSN
- 1054-139X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4200430938
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Calgary
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Keywords
- adolescents, gender differences, age differences, online sexual behavior
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Sexual Behavior, Prevalence, Text Messaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
