The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Is Delayed Driving Licensure Associated With Emerging Adult Health, Education, and Employment?
Open accessAbstract
Purpose Driving licensure remains a major developmental milestone for adolescents as they become more independent to access important health, education, and employment opportunities. Today, more teens are delaying driving licensure than before. We investigated associations of delayed licensure with health, education, and employment 4 years after high school.Methods We analyzed data from all seven annual assessments (W1-W7) of the NEXT Generation Health Study, a nationally representative cohort survey starting at 10th grade (W1, 2009-2010). The independent variable was delaying driving licensure (DDL [delaying ≥1 year] vs. No-DDL), defined as participants receiving driver licensure ≥1 year after the initial legal eligibility time until W7. Outcome variables were self-reported health, education, and employment at W7. Covariates included sex, race/ethnicity, family affluence, parental education, and urbanicity. Multinomial logistic regressions were conducted considering complex survey features.Results No-DDL versus DDL was associated with a higher likelihood of (1) excellent (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.06, p < .001), good (AOR = 1.74, p < .001), and fair (AOR = 1.34, p = .008) health compared with poor health; (2) completing a 4-year college or graduate school [AOR = 2.71, p < .001] and tech/community college [AOR = 1.92, p = .004] compared with high school or less; and (3) working ≥30 hours/week (AOR = 7.63, p = .011) and working <30 hours/week (AOR = 1.54, p = .016) compared with not working.Discussion Among emerging adults, no delay in driving licensure was associated with better self-reported health, higher education, and more working hours four years after leaving high school. Although earlier driving licensure increases driving exposure and risk, avoiding DDL appears to provide advantages for health, education, and employment during early adulthood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Graduated driver licensing (GDL) systems effectively reduce crash deaths for 16-17-year-olds by delaying licensure and minimizing exposure to high-risk driving conditions.
“While graduated driver licensing (GDL) systems effectively reduce crash deaths for the 16–17-year-olds by delaying licensure and minimizing exposure to high-risk driving conditions”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [4]
The Introduction says GDL programs reduce teen crashes and deaths, and the Discussion describes restrictions on nighttime driving and passengers. But the paper does not give a death-reduction finding specifically for 16–17-year-olds or say that GDL achieves it by delaying licensure; it cautions that teens who delay licensure beyond GDL eligibility may miss its safety benefits. The supplied passages have section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, X., Vaca, F. E., Haynie, D. L., Simons-Morton, B. G., & Li, K.
- Affiliations
- Colorado State University (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (US)
- Colorado School of Public Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gao, Xiang
- Venue
- Journal of Adolescent Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 751-756
- ISSN
- 1054-139X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9038702
- OpenAlex
- W4220963213
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Adolescent Health (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R21AA026346, R01AA026313)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275201200001C, HHSN275201200001I)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
- Keywords
- emerging adults, adolescent development, self-reported health, educational attainment, college enrollment, employment, working hours, coming of age
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Automobile Driving, Educational Status, Employment, Humans, Licensure, Schools
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review