Evaluation of vertical accuracy of open source Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The underestimation of ASTER GDEM 2 for cultivated areas and open land has also been observed in prior studies.
“This underestimation of ASTER GDEM 2 for cultivated areas and open land was also observed byJain et al. (2017)andMukherjee et al. (2013).”
From Vertical accuracy evaluation of freely available latest high-resolution (30 m) global digital elevation models over Cameroon (Central Africa) with GPS/leveling ground control points. (2019) · cites this paper as Mukherjee et al. (2013)
The vertical accuracy of global DEMs is more affected by terrain roughness.
“Since the vertical accuracy of global DEMs is more affected by the terrain roughness(Mukherjee et al. 2013;Szabó, Singh, and Szabó 2015;Varga and Bašić 2015;Jain et al. 2017), its influence on DEMs vertical accuracy was analyzed.”
From Vertical accuracy evaluation of freely available latest high-resolution (30 m) global digital elevation models over Cameroon (Central Africa) with GPS/leveling ground control points. (2019) · cites this paper as Mukherjee et al. 2013
Cites
Validation of surface height from shuttle radar topography mission using shuttle laser altimeter
Sun, G., Ranson, K. J., Kharuk, V. I., & Kovacs, K. (2003) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.09.001 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yap, L., Kandé, L. H., Nouayou, R., Kamguia, J., Ngouh, N. A., & Makuate, M. B. (2019) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2018.1458163 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mukherjee, S., Joshi, P. K., Mukherjee, S., Ghosh, A., Garg, R. D., & Mukhopadhyay, A.
- Affiliations
- TERI University (IN)
- Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN)
- Jadavpur University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Joshi, P.K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 21
- Pages
- 205-217
- ISSN
- 0303-2434 (ISSN-L)
- 1569-8432
- OpenAlex
- W1973151621
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 20.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Cartography
- Keywords
- digital elevation model, vertical accuracy, ASTER, SRTM, terrain morphology, drainage network delineation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
