CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 276Aging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesAging, Health, and Disability

Discourse of successful aging in The Globe & Mail: Insights from critical gerontology

Rozanova, Julia·2010·Journal of Aging Studies
DOI 10.1016/j.jaging.2010.05.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaging.2010.05.001

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Where successful aging research conceives of health advantages and disadvantages as results of individual responsibility, it fails to acknowledge social relations of power, environmental determinants of health, and the biopolitics of health inequalities.

    “Where successful aging research conceives of health advantages and disadvantages as the results of individual responsibility, buoyed by media narratives of aging winners and losers (Rozanova, 2010), it thus fails to acknowledge social relations of power, environmental determinants of health, and the biopolitics of health inequalities.”

    From Critical Perspectives on Successful Aging: Does It “Appeal More Than It Illuminates”? (2015) · cites this paper as Rozanova, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rozanova, J.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Rozanova, Julia
ORCID
Rozanova, Julia
Venue
Journal of Aging Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
213-222
ISSN
0890-4065 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jaging.2010.05.001
OpenAlex
W2065166842
Cited by
276
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Aging Studies (publishedVersion)
Funders
Killam Trusts
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
successful aging, critical gerontology, critical discourse analysis, age stereotypes, neoliberalism, personal responsibility, citizen participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review