Social exclusion and community in an urban retirement village
Abstract
Large purpose-built retirement complexes including continuing care options are increasingly popular ways to 'age in place' for older people in New Zealand and internationally. Promoted by their corporate owners as a lifestyle choice offering a wealth of activities and social interaction in manicured settings along with security and increasing care on site as needed, these entities offer new ways for wealthier older people to age. Applying an ethnographic approach to a case study residential complex in Auckland, New Zealand, we explore how residents experience inclusion and exclusion, and sense of community within such environments with a diversity of fit and frail residents. Data was collected from interviews, walk-about conversations, social site mapping and a selection of media material to gain an understanding of the social issues important to the residents. The twelve participants, aged between 70 and 87, were all independent residents living in the independent part of the complex, which is situated in a socio-economically wealthy suburb of Auckland. We identified that social connections were often fragile, and existing social group membership was key to shared community experiences and a sense of belonging. Residents who found themselves on the social fringes, particularly as newcomers or through health decline, were at risk of marginalisation, stigma, and social exclusion. Further, we identified how the design and layout, and tensions in the structure of the resident-ma…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social groups of ageing individuals can form homogeneous and inaccessible 'groups of exclusion' determined by compliance with constructed social codes.
“Research in gerontology suggests that social groups of ageing individuals can form homogeneous and inaccessible 'groups of exclusion' (Nielson et al. 2019: 28) determined by compliance with constructed social codes (Pietilä & Ojala 2021).”
From ‘I don’t care who joins my choir’: Investigating attitudes to diversity and inclusivity in lower- and upper-voice choirs in the United Kingdom (2025) · cites this paper as Nielson et al. 2019
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MacGregor, E. H., & Pitts, S. E. (2025) · International Journal of Community Music · doi:10.1386/ijcm_00119_1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nielson, L., Wiles, J., & Anderson, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Wiles, Janine
- Venue
- Journal of Aging Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 49
- Pages
- 25-30
- ISSN
- 0890-4065 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2934299585
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Aging Studies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
- Keywords
- retirement communities, social exclusion, sense of community, older adults, age-friendly cities, ageism, stigma, social inclusion, housing design, independent living, marginalization
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Health Status, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Motivation, New Zealand, Residence Characteristics, Retirement, Psychological Distance, Urban Health, Housing for the Elderly, Social Stigma, Social Participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review