Cited by 38Aging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesCollaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives

Social exclusion and community in an urban retirement village

Nielson, Lori, Wiles, Janine, Anderson, Anneka·2019·Journal of Aging Studies

Abstract

Large purpose-built retirement complexes including continuing care options are increasingly popular ways to 'age in place' for older people in New Zealand and internationally. Promoted by their corporate owners as a lifestyle choice offering a wealth of activities and social interaction in manicured settings along with security and increasing care on site as needed, these entities offer new ways for wealthier older people to age. Applying an ethnographic approach to a case study residential complex in Auckland, New Zealand, we explore how residents experience inclusion and exclusion, and sense of community within such environments with a diversity of fit and frail residents. Data was collected from interviews, walk-about conversations, social site mapping and a selection of media material to gain an understanding of the social issues important to the residents. The twelve participants, aged between 70 and 87, were all independent residents living in the independent part of the complex, which is situated in a socio-economically wealthy suburb of Auckland. We identified that social connections were often fragile, and existing social group membership was key to shared community experiences and a sense of belonging. Residents who found themselves on the social fringes, particularly as newcomers or through health decline, were at risk of marginalisation, stigma, and social exclusion. Further, we identified how the design and layout, and tensions in the structure of the resident-ma…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaging.2019.03.003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Nielson, L., Wiles, J., & Anderson, A.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Wiles, Janine
Venue
Journal of Aging Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
49
Pages
25-30
ISSN
0890-4065 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2934299585
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Aging Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
Keywords
retirement communities, social exclusion, sense of community, older adults, age-friendly cities, ageism, stigma, social inclusion, housing design, independent living, marginalization
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Health Status, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Motivation, New Zealand, Residence Characteristics, Retirement, Psychological Distance, Urban Health, Housing for the Elderly, Social Stigma, Social Participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review