Cited by 188COVID-19 and Mental HealthAging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and Disability

COVID-19-related loneliness and psychiatric symptoms among older adults: the buffering role of subjective age

Open access
Shrira, Amit, Hoffman, Yaakov, Bodner, Ehud, Palgi, Yuval·2020·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The study examined whether subjective age moderated the relationship between loneliness due to the COVID-19 pandemic and psychiatric symptoms.Methods A convenience sample of older adult Israelis (N = 277, mean age = 69.58 ± 6.72) completed web-based questionnaires comprising loneliness, anxiety, depressive, and peritraumatic distress symptoms. They also reported how old they felt.Results The positive relationship between loneliness due to the COVID-19 pandemic and psychiatric symptoms was weak among those who felt younger than their age while this very same relationship was robust among those feeling older.Conclusions Young subjective age may weaken the loneliness-symptom association among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Older adults holding an older age identity are more susceptible to the adverse effects of loneliness. Although preliminary, the findings may inform screening and interventions. Subjective age may help identify those at high risk in suffering from loneliness, and suggest interventions aimed at ameliorating both loneliness and older subjective ages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.05.018

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 188

Authors
Shrira, A., Hoffman, Y., Bodner, E., & Palgi, Y.
Affiliations
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
  • University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Shrira, Amit
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
28
Issue
11
Pages
1200-1204
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3030982432
Cited by
188
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 13
FWCI
15.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, loneliness, subjective age, older adults, psychiatric symptoms, anxiety, depression, peritraumatic distress, age identity, moderation, mental health screening
MeSH terms
Emotional Adjustment, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Aged, Aging, Behavioral Symptoms, Communicable Disease Control, Female, Humans, Israel, Loneliness, Male, Mental Health, Pneumonia, Viral, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Self-Assessment, Self Concept, Social Isolation, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics, Protective Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review