Cited by 82Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Use by Older AdultsAging, Health, and Disability

One Year Impact on Social Connectedness for Homebound Older Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial of Tele-delivered Behavioral Activation Versus Tele-delivered Friendly Visits

Open access
Bruce, Martha L., Pepin, Renee, Marti, C. Nathan, Stevens, Courtney J., Choi, Namkee G.·2021·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives Lonely and socially isolated homebound older participants of a randomized trial comparing behavioral activation (BA) versus friendly visiting, both delivered by lay counselors using tele-videoconferencing, were reassessed at 1-year to determine whether benefits at 12 weeks were maintained over time.Methods The study reinterviewed 64/89 (71.9%) participants.Results The positive 12-week impact of tailored BA on 3 indicators of social connectedness (loneliness, social interaction and satisfactions with social support) was maintained, albeit to a lesser degree, over 1 year. The positive impact on depressive symptoms and disability was also maintained.Conclusions The intervention's potential reach and scalability are suggested by several factors: participants were recruited by home delivered meals programs during routine assessments; the intervention was brief and delivered by lay counselors; care delivery by tele-videoconferencing is increasingly common. The 1 year outcomes indicate that brief BA delivered by tele-video conferencing can have an enduring impact on social connectedness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.05.005

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 82

Authors
Bruce, M. L., Pepin, R., Marti, C. N., Stevens, C. J., & Choi, N. G.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Bruce, Martha L.
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
771-776
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010537616
Cited by
82
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14
FWCI
12.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH
  • AARP Foundation (T32 MH073553)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
behavioral activation, homebound older adults, social connectedness, loneliness, social isolation, lay counselors, social support, depressive symptoms, disability, intervention maintenance, scalability
MeSH terms
Aged, Depression, Humans, Loneliness, Social Support, Homebound Persons, Videoconferencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review