Mouse sensitivity is an independent risk factor for rhinitis in children with asthma
Open accessAbstract
Background Although mouse and cockroach allergy is known to be important in urban children with asthma, the independent association of mouse and cockroach sensitization with rhinitis in these children is unknown.Objective To determine the association of mouse and cockroach sensitization with rhinitis in urban children with asthma.Methods As part of the Mouse Allergen and Asthma Intervention Trial, 499 urban children (5-17 years) with persistent asthma underwent spirometry, skin prick testing to 14 common environmental allergens, and serology for mouse-specific IgE. In 269 subjects, cockroach-specific IgE serology was also obtained. Patient/parent-reported rhinitis in the last 2 weeks and the last 1 year was the primary outcome measure. Mouse/cockroach exposure was measured by reported frequency of sightings. Mouse allergen-settled bedroom dust samples were also measured in mouse-sensitized children.Results Rhinitis was reported in 49.9% and 70.2% of the participants within the last 2 weeks and the last 1 year, respectively. Serum mouse IgE level of 0.35 IU/mL or more was associated with rhinitis in the past 2 weeks (adjusted odds ratio, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.02-4.54; P = .04) and the past 1 year (adjusted odds ratio, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.12-5.1; P = .02) after controlling for age, race, sex, the presence of any smokers at home, primary caregiver education level, number of allergen sensitivities, cockroach IgE level of 0.35 IU/mL or more, and study site (Boston or Baltimore). Measures of home mouse exposure were not associated with rhinitis, regardless of mouse sensitivity. Cockroach sensitivity was not associated with rhinitis regardless of sensitization to other allergens.Conclusions In urban children with asthma, increased mouse IgE, but not cockroach IgE, in the sera (mouse IgE ≥ 0.35 IU/mL) may be associated independently with rhinitis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Exposure to indoor allergens is linked to the development of allergic asthma and to asthma-related illness, especially in urban and low-income areas where dust mite, cockroach, and rodent allergens are more concentrated.
“Environmental allergen exposure has been extensively associated with both the development of allergic asthma and asthma morbidity, particularly in urban and low-income areas where exposure to allergens such as dust mites, cockroaches, and rodents is heightened (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13).”
From Indoor Allergen Interventions in Homes and Schools for Managing Asthma (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
The Introduction links mouse and cockroach allergy to worse asthma outcomes in urban children, and the Discussion says mouse and cockroach allergen levels are elevated in urban homes. The paper does not establish that indoor allergen exposure contributes to the development of allergic asthma or that dust mite exposure is heightened in urban or low-income areas. The cited passages have no page numbers in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Sedaghat, A. R., Matsui, E. C., Baxi, S. N., Bollinger, M. E., Miller, R., Perzanowski, M., & Phipatanakul, W.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Phipatanakul, Wanda
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 82-88.e1
- ISSN
- 2213-2198 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4715958
- OpenAlex
- W2074751669
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (U01 AL 110397, U01 AL 083238)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U01AI110397, K24AI114769, R01AI073964, K24AI106822, U01AI083238)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES009089)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025758)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
- Keywords
- rhinitis, childhood asthma, persistent asthma, environmental allergens, allergen exposure, urban children
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Allergens, Animals, Asthma, Child, Child, Preschool, Cockroaches, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin E, Male, Risk, Skin Tests, Spirometry, Urban Population, Insect Proteins, Mice, Rhinitis, Allergic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review