Use and Interpretation of Acute and Baseline Tryptase in Perioperative Hypersensitivity and Anaphylaxis
Abstract
Paired acute and baseline serum or plasma tryptase sampling and determination have recently been included as a mechanistic approach in the diagnostic and management guidelines of perioperative immediate hypersensitivity and anaphylaxis. The timing of this paired sampling is clearly defined in international consensus statements, with the optimal window for acute tryptase sampling between 30 minutes and 2 hours after the initiation of symptoms, whereas baseline tryptase should be measured in a sample collected before the event (preop) or at least 24 hours after all signs and symptoms have resolved. A transient elevation of the acute tryptase level greater than [2 + (1.2 × baseline tryptase level)] supports the involvement and activation of mast cells. Here, we provide the clinical, pathophysiological, and technical rationale for the procedure and interpretation of paired acute and baseline tryptase. Clinical examples, up-to-date knowledge of hereditary α-tryptasemia as a frequent cause of baseline tryptase of 7 μg/L and higher, mastocytosis, other clonal myeloid disorders, cardiovascular or renal failure, and technical improvements resulting in continued lowering of the 95th percentile value are discussed. Clues for improved management of perioperative immediate hypersensitivity and anaphylaxis include (1) sustained dissemination and implementation of updated guidelines; (2) preoperative sample storage for deferred analysis; (3) referral for thorough allergy investigation, scre…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Generally, the severity and magnitude of hypotension in anaphylaxis correlate with the height of tryptase.
“Generally, the severity and magnitude of hypotension in anaphylaxis correlate with the height of tryptase [29,30].”
From Diagnostic Significance of Tryptase for Suspected Mast Cell Disorders (2023) · cites this paper as [30]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 126 · Cited by 79
- Authors
- Vitte, J., Sabato, V., Tacquard, C., Garvey, L. H., Michel, M., Mertes, P.-M., Ebo, D. G., Schwartz, L. B., & Castells, M. C.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Castells, Mariana C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2994-3005
- ISSN
- 2213-2198 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3136716575
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 126
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
- Keywords
- tryptase, anaphylaxis, mast cell activation, hereditary alpha-tryptasemia, mastocytosis, anesthetic management
- MeSH terms
- Anaphylaxis, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Mast Cells, Mastocytosis, Consensus, Tryptases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review