Cited by 30Mast cells and histamineAsthma and respiratory diseasesFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research

Increased Excretion of Mast Cell Mediator Metabolites During Mast Cell Activation Syndrome

Butterfield, Joseph H.·2023·The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice

Abstract

Background One requirement for diagnosing mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is an increase, above an established baseline level, in serum tryptase by 20% plus 2 ng/mL. However, there is no consensus of what constitutes excretion of a substantial increase in metabolites from prostaglandin D 2 , histamine, or leukotriene E 4 in MCAS. Objective Ratios of acute/baseline levels for each urinary metabolite that accompanied tryptase increases of 20% plus 2 ng/mL were determined. Methods Mayo Clinic databases of patients with systemic mastocytosis with or without MCAS were reviewed. Patients with the requisite increase in serum tryptase during MCAS were examined for those who also had acute/baseline measurements of urinary mediator metabolite(s). Results Ratios of acute/baseline levels for tryptase and for each urinary metabolite were calculated. For all patients, the average acute/baseline ratio (SD) for tryptase was 4.88 (3.77). Average ratios of urinary mediator metabolites were: leukotriene E 4 : 35.98 (50.59), 2,3-dinor-11β-prostaglandin F2α: 7.28 (6.89), and N-methyl histamine: 3.2 (2.31). The lowest acute-baseline ratios for each of the three metabolites accompanying a tryptase increase of 20% plus 2 ng/mL were similar, with values of about 1.3. Conclusions To the author's knowledge, this is the largest series of mast cell mediator metabolite measurements during episodes of MCAS that were verified by the requisite tryptase increase above baseline. Unexpectedly, leukotriene…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.02.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An increase of 1.3 in leukotriene E4, 2,3-dinor-11b-prostaglandinF2a, and n-methylhistamine has been proposed as a possible sign of mast cell activation.

    “although an increase of 1.3 in leukotriene E4, 2,3-dinor-11b-prostaglandinF2a, and n-methylhistamine has been proposed as a possible sign of MCA [87].”
  • Other biomarkers such as prostaglandin D2, leukotriene E4, and N-methylhistamine are relatively less available and less specific and lack defined thresholds.

    “Other biomarkers such as prostaglandin D 2 , leukotriene E 4 , and N-methylhistamine are relatively less available and less specific and lack defined thresholds.1,28”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 30

Authors
Butterfield, J. H.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Butterfield, Joseph H.
Venue
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
2542-2546
ISSN
2213-2198 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4322628303
Cited by
30
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Keywords
mast cell activation syndrome, urinary leukotriene E4, serum tryptase, systemic mastocytosis
MeSH terms
Mast Cell Activation Syndrome, Histamine, Humans, Mast Cells, Mastocytosis, Leukotriene E4, Tryptases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review