Facile synthesis 3D porous MXene Ti3C2Tx@RGO composite aerogel with excellent dielectric loss and electromagnetic wave absorption
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The broad (002) peak infers that GO has successfully been reduced into rGO during preparation of the aerogel.
“This broad peak infers that GO has successfully been reduced into rGO during the preparation of aerogel [54].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 243
- Authors
- Wang, L., Liu, H., Lv, X., Cui, G., & Gu, G.
- Affiliations
- Chengdu University (CN)
- PLA Army Engineering University (CN)
- Fudan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Cui, Guangzhen
- Gu, Guangxin
- Venue
- Journal of Alloys and Compounds
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 828
- Pages
- 154251
- ISSN
- 0925-8388 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3004751124
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 20
- FWCI
- 24.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Alloys and Compounds (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fudan University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Electromagnetic wave absorption materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › MXene and MAX Phase Materials
- Keywords
- Ti3C2Tx MXene, reduced graphene oxide, microwave absorption, electromagnetic wave absorption, dielectric loss, heterostructures, interface polarization, dipole polarization, multiple scattering, lightweight microwave absorbers, hydrothermal synthesis, freeze-drying
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
