CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Advanced Welding Techniques AnalysisHigh-Velocity Impact and Material BehaviorWelding Techniques and Residual Stresses

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gradient of nanostructures at the interface of Al/Cu welded joints produced by the high strain-rate collision during magnetic pulse impact welding

Open access
Raoelison, R.N., Li, J.S., Sapanathan, T., Zhang, Z., Chen, X-G., Marceau, D., Rachik, M.·2024·Journal of Alloys and Metallurgical Systems
DOI 10.1016/j.jalmes.2024.100060
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper focuses on the nanoscale characterization of a welded Al/Cu interface produced by magnetic pulse welding. Welding tests were performed using three field shapers with similar in dimension but having strongly different in electrical conductivity. Other welding parameters were strictly remained the same. The three tests produce similar welded joints that consist of a similar morphology of wavy interface at the macroscopic scale. Thus, the Al to Cu transition zone across the location of an interfacial wave is identified as a suitable repetitive site that enables for repetitive fine-scale characterization across a distance less than 1 µm. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) observations of the welded Al/Cu interface reveal a gradient of nanostructures which consists of an amorphous AlxCuy nanolayer (~30 nm) and then, a nanocrystalline layer with a thin thickness of a few tens of nanometres at the Cu side and at the Al side as well. This hierarchical nano-featured structure is confined within a very short total distance of about 200 nm. Outside these confined nanostructures, the interface exhibits a crystalline structure. These nanofeatures were observed at the interface of the Al/Cu welded joint produced by three different field shapers, that shows a reproducibility of the interface structure at the nanoscale level. A thermomechanical analysis of the high strain process at a collision point allows for depicting the mechanism of microstructure formation confined at th…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalmes.2024.100060

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Zhang, 2011, Application of high velocity impact welding at varied different length scales, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 211, 944, 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.01.001 · DOI
  2. Wang, 2019, High-velocity impact welding process: a review, Metals, 9, 144, 10.3390/met9020144 · DOI
  3. Psyk, 2017, Process analysis for magnetic pulse welding of similar and dissimilar material sheet metal joints, Procedia Eng., 207, 353, 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.787 · DOI
  4. Nescoromniy, 2016, Research and development of tubular products magnetic pulse welding–forming technology for space engineering, Procedia Eng., 150, 930, 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.065 · DOI
  5. Kapil, 2015, Magnetic pulse welding: an efficient and environmentally friendly multi-material joining technique, J. Clean. Prod., 100, 35, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.042 · DOI
  6. Shribman, V., Gafri, O., Livshitz, Y. Magnetic Pulse Welding: Joining – A New Tool for the Automotive Industry, in: 2001. https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-3408. · DOI
  7. Sapanathan, 2016, Magnetic pulse welding: an innovative joining technology for similar and dissimilar metal pairs, Join. Technol., 10.5772/63525 · DOI
  8. Watanabe, 2009, High-speed deformation and collision behavior of pure aluminum plates in magnetic pulse welding, Mater. Trans., 50, 2035, 10.2320/matertrans.L-M2009816 · DOI
  9. Raoelison, 2013, Study of the elaboration of a practical weldability window in magnetic pulse welding, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 213, 1348, 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.004 · DOI
  10. Raoelison, 2012, Efficient welding conditions in magnetic pulse welding process, J. Manuf. Process., 14, 372, 10.1016/j.jmapro.2012.04.001 · DOI
  11. Khalil, 2020, Construction of physical welding windows for magnetic pulse welding of 5754 aluminum with DC04 steel, Int J. Mater. Form.
  12. P. Groche, M. Becker, C. Pabst, Process window acquisition for impact welding processes, Materials & Design (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.013. · DOI
  13. Wang, 2015, An experimental and numerical study of laser impact spot welding, Mater. Des., 65, 1143, 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.044 · DOI
  14. Hoseini Athar, 2015, Weldability window and the effect of interface morphology on the properties of Al/Cu/Al laminated composites fabricated by explosive welding, Mater. Des., 86, 516, 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.114 · DOI
  15. Bahrani, 1967, The mechanics of wave formation in explosive welding, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci., 296, 123
  16. Émurlaeva, 2019, Welding window: comparison of Deribas’ and Wittman’s approaches and SPH simulation results, Metals, 9, 1323, 10.3390/met9121323 · DOI
  17. Li, 2022, Determining the weldability window based on the interface morphologies formed during high-speed collision in magnetic pulse welding, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 1
  18. Kiselev, 2012, Numerical simulation of wave formation in an oblique impact of plates by the method of molecular dynamics, J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys., 53, 907, 10.1134/S0021894412060144 · DOI
  19. Kiselev, 2012, Numerical and experimental modeling of jet formation during a high-velocity oblique impact of metal plates, Combust. Explos. Shock Waves, 48, 214, 10.1134/S0010508212020116 · DOI
  20. Raoelison, 2016, Interfacial kinematics and governing mechanisms under the influence of high strain rate impact conditions: Numerical computations of experimental observations, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 96, 147, 10.1016/j.jmps.2016.07.014 · DOI
  21. Akbari Mousavi, 2005, Numerical and experimental studies of the mechanism of the wavy interface formations in explosive/impact welding, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 53, 2501, 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.06.001 · DOI
  22. Abe, 1999, Numerical simulation of the plastic flow field near the bonding surface of explosive welding, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 85, 162, 10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00283-0 · DOI
  23. Abe, 1996, Numerical study of the mechanism of wavy interface generation in explosive welding, Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. Ser. B, 62, 2626, 10.1299/kikaib.62.2626 · DOI
  24. Sapanathan, 2016, Depiction of interfacial characteristic changes during impact welding using computational methods: comparison between arbitrary Lagrangian - Eulerian and Eulerian simulations, Mater. Des., 102, 303, 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.025 · DOI
  25. Nassiri, 2014, Spatial stability analysis of emergent wavy interfacial patterns in magnetic pulsed welding, CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., 63, 245, 10.1016/j.cirp.2014.03.023 · DOI
  26. Baek, 2021, A semi-Lagrangian reproducing kernel particle method with particle-based shock algorithm for explosive welding simulation, Comput. Mech., 67, 1601, 10.1007/s00466-021-02008-2 · DOI
  27. Wang, 2012, Numerical study of the mechanism of explosive/impact welding using smoothed particle hydrodynamics method, Mater. Des., 35, 210, 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.047 · DOI
  28. Wang, 2018, Numerical simulation of laser impact spot welding, J. Manuf. Process., 35, 396, 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.028 · DOI
  29. Raoelison, 2023, Transformation sequence of Mg-Si precipitates towards a precipitation of Mn and Cr containing phase governed by the high strain-rate collision during magnetic pulse welding of Al-Mg-Si alloy, J. Alloy. Metall. Syst., 4
  30. Wang, 2020, Electromagnetic pulse welding of Al/Cu dissimilar materials: microstructure and tensile properties, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A, 792, 10.1016/j.msea.2020.139842 · DOI
  31. Demonie, 2016, Influence of process parameters on the weld quality of dissimilar Cu-Al magnetic pulse welded sheets, Int. J. Sustain. Constr. Des., 7, 8
  32. Aizawa, 2016, Experimental and numerical analysis of the formation behavior of intermediate layers at explosive welded Al/Fe joint interfaces, J. Manuf. Process., 24, 100, 10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.08.002 · DOI
  33. Bellmann, 2021, Influence of copper interlayers on the magnetic pulse welding process between aluminum and steel, Metals, 11, 868, 10.3390/met11060868 · DOI
  34. T. Itoi, A.B. Mohamad, R. Suzuki, K. Okagawa, Microstructure evolution of a dissimilar junction interface between an Al sheet and a Ni-coated Cu sheet joined by magnetic pulse welding, Materials Characterization (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2016.05.021. · DOI
  35. Sun, 2014, Bonding interface of W–CuCrZr explosively welded composite plates for plasma facing components, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 30, 1230, 10.1016/j.jmst.2014.11.014 · DOI
  36. Pourabbas, 2019, Investigation of structural and mechanical properties of magnetic pulse welded dissimilar aluminum alloys, J. Manuf. Process., 37, 292, 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.002 · DOI
  37. Zhang, 2023, Interfacial defects evolution of Al 6061 / SS304 electromagnetic pulse welding joints during post welding isothermal treatment, Mater. Today Commun., 35
  38. Watanabe, 2009, Interfacial microstructure of aluminum/metallic glass lap joints fabricated by magnetic pulse welding, Mater. Trans., 50, 1279, 10.2320/matertrans.ME200835 · DOI
  39. Raoelison, 2015, Magnetic pulse welding of Al/Al and Al/Cu metal pairs: consequences of the dissimilar combination on the interfacial behavior during the welding process, J. Manuf. Process., 20, 112, 10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.09.003 · DOI
  40. Li, 2020, Interface evolution during magnetic pulse welding under extremely high strain rate collision: mechanisms, thermomechanical kinetics and consequences, Acta Mater., 195, 404, 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.05.028 · DOI
  41. Raoelison, 2014, Magnetic pulse welding: interface of Al/Cu joint and investigation of intermetallic formation effect on the weld features, J. Manuf. Process., 16, 427, 10.1016/j.jmapro.2014.05.002 · DOI
  42. Watanabe, 2018, Interfacial microstructure and hardness of magnetic pulse welded copper/nickel lap joint, Mater. Trans., M2017289
  43. Watanabe, 2023, Interfacial microstructure and strength of magnetic pulse welded A5052 aluminum Alloy/SPCC steel lap joint, Mater. Trans., 64, 479, 10.2320/matertrans.MT-LA2022018 · DOI
  44. Raoelison, 2019, A new nature of microporous architecture with hierarchical porosity and membrane template via high strain rate collision, Materialia, 5, 10.1016/j.mtla.2018.100205 · DOI
  45. Sapanathan, 2017, In situ metallic porous structure formation due to ultra high heating and cooling rates during an electromagnetic pulse welding, Scr. Mater., 128, 10, 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.09.030 · DOI
  46. Yu, 2013, Mechanical property and microstructure of aluminum alloy-steel tubes joint by magnetic pulse welding, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A, 561, 259, 10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.015 · DOI
  47. Raoelison, 2023, Effect of the nanopores in the Al-Cu intermetallic phase on nanoindentation instabilities at the Al/Cu interface of a magnetic pulse impact weld, Materialia, 32, 10.1016/j.mtla.2023.101955 · DOI
  48. Li, 2020, An anomalous wave formation at the Al/Cu interface during magnetic pulse welding, Appl. Phys. Lett., 116, 10.1063/5.0005299 · DOI
  49. Li, 2019, A predictive and reliable Eulerian model to compute the interface kinetics of magnetic pulse welding, NUMIFORM 2019: 13th Int. Conf. Numer. Methods Ind. Form. Process., 635
  50. Li, 2019, Assessing the influence of fieldshaper material on magnetic pulse welded interface of Al/Cu joints, Procedia Manuf., 29, 337, 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.146 · DOI
  51. Sapanathan, 2016, Formation of porous inner architecture at the interface of magnetic pulse welded Al/Cu joints, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1769
  52. Li, 2021, On the complete interface development of Al/Cu magnetic pulse welding via experimental characterizations and multiphysics numerical simulations, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117185 · DOI
  53. Zou, 2009, Dynamic recrystallization in the particle/particle interfacial region of cold-sprayed nickel coating: electron backscatter diffraction characterization, Scr. Mater., 61, 899, 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.07.020 · DOI
  54. Kim, 2008, Grain refinement in a single titanium powder particle impacted at high velocity, Scr. Mater., 59, 768, 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.06.020 · DOI
  55. Raoelison, 2016, Interfacial kinematics and governing mechanisms under the influence of high strain rate impact conditions: numerical computations of experimental observations, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 96, 147, 10.1016/j.jmps.2016.07.014 · DOI
  56. Gupta, 2019, A robust process-structure model for predicting the joint interface structure in impact welding, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 264, 107, 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.08.047 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Raoelison, R. N., Li, J. S., Sapanathan, T., Zhang, Z., Chen, X.-G., Marceau, D., & Rachik, M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Université de Technologie de Compiègne (FR)
  • Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Raoelison, R.N.
  • Li, J.S.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Alloys and Metallurgical Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
5
Pages
100060
ISSN
2949-9178 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jalmes.2024.100060
OpenAlex
W4391648589
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Alloys and Metallurgical Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Keywords
nanocrystalline layer, shear rate, thermal kinetics, dynamic recrystallization, crystal nucleation, thermomechanical analysis, hierarchical nanostructures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review