Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 517

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical core of the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative: Progress and plans

Open access
Aisen, Paul S., Petersen, Ronald C., Donohue, Michael C., Gamst, Anthony, Raman, Rema, Thomas, Ronald G., Walter, Sarah, Trojanowski, John Q., Shaw, Leslie M., Beckett, Laurel A., Jack, Clifford R., Jagust, William, Toga, Arthur W., Saykin, Andrew J., Morris, John C., Green, Robert C., Weiner, Michael W., Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·2010·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

The Clinical Core of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) has provided clinical, operational, and data management support to ADNI since its inception. This article reviews the activities and accomplishments of the core in support of ADNI aims. These include the enrollment and follow‐up of more than 800 subjects in the three original cohorts: healthy controls, amnestic mild cognitive impairment (now referred to as late MCI, or LMCI), and mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the first phase of ADNI (ADNI 1), with baseline longitudinal, clinical, and cognitive assessments. These data, when combined with genetic, neuroimaging, and cerebrospinal fluid measures, have provided important insights into the neurobiology of the AD spectrum. Furthermore, these data have facilitated the development of novel clinical trial designs. ADNI has recently been extended with funding from an NIH Grand Opportunities (GO) award, and the new ADNI GO phase has been launched; this includes the enrollment of a new cohort, called early MCI, with milder episodic memory impairment than the LMCI group. An application for a further 5 years of ADNI funding (ADNI 2) was recently submitted. This funding would support ongoing follow‐up of the original ADNI 1 and ADNI GO cohorts, as well as additional recruitment into all categories. The resulting data would provide valuable data on the earliest stages of AD, and support the development of interventions in these critically important populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.03.006

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 517

Metadata

Authors
Aisen, P. S., Petersen, R. C., Donohue, M. C., Gamst, A., Raman, R., Thomas, R. G., Walter, S., Trojanowski, J. Q., Shaw, L. M., Beckett, L. A., Jack, C. R., Jagust, W., Toga, A. W., Saykin, A. J., Morris, J. C., Green, R. C., Weiner, M. W., & Initiative, A. D. N.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
239-246
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2010176747
Cited by
517
References
14
FWCI
15.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (U01‐AG024904, U01‐AG10483)
  • National Institutes of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical core of the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative: Progress and plans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jalz.2010.03.006
The paper
Aisen, P. S., Petersen, R. C., Donohue, M. C., Gamst, A., Raman, R., Thomas, R. G., Walter, S., Trojanowski, J. Q., Shaw, L. M., Beckett, L. A., Jack, C. R., Jagust, W., Toga, A. W., Saykin, A. J., Morris, J. C., Green, R. C., Weiner, M. W., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2010). Clinical core of the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative: Progress and plans. Alzheimer's & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2010.03.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.