Cited by 77Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Functions and MemoryCognitive Abilities and Testing

Can a novel computerized cognitive screening test provide additional information for early detection of Alzheimer's disease?

Open access
Tarnanas, Ioannis, Tsolaki, Magda, Nef, Tobias, M. Müri, René, Mosimann, Urs P.·2014·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality testing of everyday activities is a novel type of computerized assessment that measures cognitive, executive, and motor performance as a screening tool for early dementia. This study used a virtual reality day-out task (VR-DOT) environment to evaluate its predictive value in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS: One hundred thirty-four patients with MCI were selected and compared with 75 healthy control subjects. Participants received an initial assessment that included VR-DOT, a neuropsychological evaluation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, and event-related potentials (ERPs). After 12 months, participants were assessed again with MRI, ERP, VR-DOT, and neuropsychological tests. RESULTS: At the end of the study, we differentiated two subgroups of patients with MCI according to their clinical evolution from baseline to follow-up: 56 MCI progressors and 78 MCI nonprogressors. VR-DOT performance profiles correlated strongly with existing predictive biomarkers, especially the ERP and MRI biomarkers of cortical thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with ERP, MRI, or neuropsychological tests alone, the VR-DOT could provide additional predictive information in a low-cost, computerized, and noninvasive way.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.01.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 77

Authors
Tarnanas, I., Tsolaki, M., Nef, T., M. Müri, R., & Mosimann, U. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group University of Bern Bern Switzerland
Corresponding author
Tarnanas, Ioannis
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03-20
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
790-798
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W1999733637
Cited by
77
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Funders
PharmaCog
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Analysis of Variance, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, User-Computer Interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review