Cited by 2Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

O2‐05‐01: A DATA‐DRIVEN MODEL OF BIOMARKER CHANGES IN SPORADIC ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

Young, Alexandra L., Oxtoby, Neil P., Daga, Pankaj, Cash, David M., Fox, Nick, Ourselin, Sebastien, Schott, Jonathan M., Alexander, Daniel C.·2014·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Determining the sequence in which Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers become abnormal would provide important insights into disease biology and a mechanism for disease staging. Here we implement a probabilistic event-based model (EBM) (Fonteijn et al. 2012) to determine the sequence of biomarker abnormality in sporadic AD, characterise the uncertainty in the ordering, and provide a natural patient staging system. Unlike previous attempts to construct such a model, our method does not rely on a-priori clinical diagnostic information, or explicit biomarker cut-points, and it allows for a proportion of cases and controls to be misdiagnosed. We included 285 ADNI subjects (92 cognitively normal (CN), 129 mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 64 AD) with measurements of 14 AD-related biomarkers including CSF A β 1-42, p-tau, t-tau, whole brain and regional MRI brain volumes and rates of atrophy over one year, and three cognitive test scores. We used the EBM to determine the sequence of biomarker abnormality and its uncertainty in various population subgroups. We used patient stages assigned by the EBM to discriminate CN from AD subjects, and predict conversion from MCI to AD and CN to MCI. The model predicts (Figure 1) that CSF measures become abnormal first, followed by rates of atrophy, then cognitive test scores, and finally regional brain volumes. In amyloid positive (CSF A β 1-42<192 pg/ml) or APOE positive subjects, the model predicts with high confidence that the CSF biomarkers b…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.180

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Young, A. L., Oxtoby, N. P., Daga, P., Cash, D. M., Fox, N., Ourselin, S., Schott, J. M., & Alexander, D. C.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University College London London United Kingdom
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Corresponding author
Young, Alexandra L.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07
Volume
10
Issue
4S_Part_2
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2092792652
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
sporadic Alzheimer's disease, Alzheimer's disease biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review