Calcium Hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease and brain aging: a framework for integrating new evidence into a comprehensive theory of pathogenesis
Abstract
This article updates the Calcium Hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease and brain aging on the basis of emerging evidence since 1994 (The present article, with the subtitle “New evidence for a central role of Ca 2+ in neurodegeneration,” includes three appendices that provide context and further explanations for the rationale for the revisions in the updated hypothesis—the three appendices are as follows: Appendix I “Emerging concepts on potential pathogenic roles of [Ca 2+],” Appendix II “Future studies to validate the central role of dysregulated [Ca 2+] in neurodegeneration,” and Appendix III “Epilogue: towards a comprehensive hypothesis.”) (Marx J. Fresh evidence points to an old suspect: calcium. Science 2007; 318:384–385). The aim is not only to re‐evaluate the original key claims of the hypothesis with a critical eye but also to identify gaps in knowledge required to validate relevant claims and delineate additional studies and/or data that are needed. Some of the key challenges for this effort included examination of questions regarding (1) the temporal and spatial relationships of molecular mechanisms that regulate neuronal calcium ion (Ca 2+), (2) the role of changes in concentration of calcium ion [Ca 2+] in various subcellular compartments of neurons, (3) how alterations in Ca 2+ signaling affect the performance of neurons under various conditions, ranging from optimal functioning in a healthy state to conditions of decline and deterioration in performance during aging and in disease, and (4) new ideas about the contributions of aging, genetic, and environmental factors to the causal relationships between dysregulation of [Ca 2+] and the functioning of neurons (see Appendices I and II). The updated Calcium Hypothesis also includes revised postulates that are intended to promote further crucial experiments to confirm or reject the various predictions of the hypothesis (see Appendix III).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The calcium hypothesis of AD postulates that a synergistic relationship between Aβ accumulation and Ca2+ levels promotes neurodegeneration.
“consistent with the calcium hypothesis of AD which postulates that a synergistic relationship between Aβ accumulation and Ca2+ levels promotes neurodegeneration.77”
From Single nucleus multiomics identifies ZEB1 and MAFB as candidate regulators of Alzheimer’s disease-specific cis-regulatory elements (2023) · cites this paper as [77]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 311
- Authors
- Alzheimer's Association Calcium Hypothesis Workgroup, & Khachaturian, Z. S.
- Corresponding author
- Khachaturian, Zaven S.
- Venue
- Alzheimer's & Dementia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-01-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 178
- ISSN
- 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5279
- OpenAlex
- W2999063211
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 9 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R37AG004542)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, brain aging
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Calcium, Humans, Models, Neurological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review