Cited by 2Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

[P3–338]: IN VIVO TAU PET IMAGING IN EARLY‐ONSET ALZHEIMER's DISEASE AND LATE‐ONSET ALZHEIMER's DISEASE

Noh, Young, Na, Han Kyu, Seo, Seongho, Lee, Sang‐Yoon, Jeong, Hye Jin, Okamura, Nobuyuki, Ido, Tatsuo, Na, Duk L.·2017·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to compare overall tau topography, inter-regional connectivity of tau deposition between early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) and to investigate the pattern of tau spreading according to disease severity in EOAD and LOAD, with recently developed tau PET tracer, 18F-THK5351. We included total number of 197 participants including 65 patients with EOAD (onset age < 65), 54 patients with LOAD (onset age ≥ 65), 37 young participants (age < 65) and 41 elderly participants (age ≥ 65) with normal cognition. Standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) images were calculated from 50–70 minutes 18F-THK5351 PET scans. Voxel-wise analyses and regional analyses were performed. To investigate the distinct features of inter-regional correlation of THK retention, connectivity matrices were calculated. Global retention ratios of THK were not significantly different between EOAD and LOAD. Compared to LOAD, EOAD had greater THK retention in the bilateral inferior parietal, dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, and precuneus. Meanwhile, LOAD had more THK retention in the bilateral inferior temporal, anterior cingulate cortices and basal forebrain, compared to EOAD. Connectivity matrix of inter-regional THK retention revealed loss of the cortico-limbic correlation in the EOAD. When THK retention was compared as a function of CDR stage, EOAD showed high THK retention in the association cortices at the early stages of disease (CDR…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.1553

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noh, Y., Na, H. K., Seo, S., Lee, S., Jeong, H. J., Okamura, N., Ido, T., & Na, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Gachon University Gil Medical Center (KR)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Gachon University (KR)
  • Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University (JP)
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07
Volume
13
Issue
7S_Part_22
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2765618888
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
early-onset Alzheimer's disease, late-onset Alzheimer's disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review