Cited by 138Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Polygenic risk score of sporadic late‐onset Alzheimer's disease reveals a shared architecture with the familial and early‐onset forms

Open access
Cruchaga, Carlos, Del‐Aguila, Jorge L., Saef, Benjamin, Black, Kathleen, Fernandez, Maria Victoria, Budde, John, Ibanez, Laura, Deming, Yuetiva +12 more·2018·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the extent of overlap of the genetic architecture among the sporadic late‐onset Alzheimer's Disease (sLOAD), familial late‐onset AD (fLOAD), sporadic early‐onset AD (sEOAD), and autosomal dominant early‐onset AD (eADAD). Methods: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) were constructed using previously identified 21 genome‐wide significant loci for LOAD risk. Results: We found that there is an overlap in the genetic architecture among sEOAD, fLOAD, and sLOAD. The highest association of the PRS and risk (odds ratio [OR] = 2.27; P = 1.29 × 10 −7 ) was observed in sEOAD, followed by fLOAD (OR = 1.75; P = 1.12 × 10 −7 ) and sLOAD (OR = 1.40; P = 1.21 × 10 −3 ). The PRS was associated with cerebrospinal fluid ptau 181 ‐Aβ 42 on eADAD ( P = 4.36 × 10 −2 ). Conclusion: Our analysis confirms that the genetic factors identified for LOAD modulate risk in sLOAD and fLOAD and also sEOAD cohorts. Specifically, our results suggest that the burden of these risk variants is associated with familial clustering and earlier onset of AD. Although these variants are not associated with risk in the eADAD, they may be modulating age at onset.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.08.013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GWAS variants were not associated with risk for familial EOAD inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion.

    “Although GWAS variants were not associated with risk for familial EOAD inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion, the researchers noted that the sample size was small and that variant burden may have been associated with age at symptom onset in these families [26].”

    From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 56 · Cited by 138

Authors
Cruchaga, C., Del‐Aguila, J. L., Saef, B., Black, K., Fernandez, M. V., Budde, J., Ibanez, L., Deming, Y., Kapoor, M., Tosto, G., Mayeux, R. P., Holtzman, D. M., Fagan, A. M., Morris, J. C., Bateman, R. J., Goate, A. M., Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN), (ADNI), D. N. I., study, N. F., & Harari, O.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO USA
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra (DO)
Corresponding author
Harari, Oscar
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-21
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
205-214
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2739334724
Cited by
138
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
10.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (UL1TR000448)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  • National Institute on Aging
  • Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (U01 AG024904)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
  • National Institutes of Health (P50 AG05681, P01 AG03991, P01 AG026276, R01‐AG044546, P01‐AG003991, RF1AG053303, R01‐AG035083, R01‐NS085419)
  • Alzheimer's Association (NIRG‐11‐200110)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, polygenic risk score
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Family Health, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Peptide Fragments, ROC Curve, Cohort Studies, Logistic Models, Databases, Bibliographic, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Age of Onset, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Multifactorial Inheritance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review