Cited by 621Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

Plasma phospho‐tau181 increases with Alzheimer's disease clinical severity and is associated with tau‐ and amyloid‐positron emission tomography

Open access
Mielke, Michelle M., Hagen, Clinton E., Xu, Jing, Chai, Xiyun, Vemuri, Prashanthi, Lowe, Val J., Airey, David C., Knopman, David S. +5 more·2018·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Introduction: We examined and compared plasma phospho‐tau181 (pTau181) and total tau: (1) across the Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical spectrum; (2) in relation to brain amyloid β (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET), tau PET, and cortical thickness; and (3) as a screening tool for elevated brain Aβ. Methods: Participants included 172 cognitively unimpaired, 57 mild cognitively impaired, and 40 AD dementia patients with concurrent Aβ PET (Pittsburgh compound B), tau PET (AV1451), magnetic resonance imaging, plasma total tau, and pTau181. Results: Plasma total tau and pTau181 levels were higher in AD dementia patients than those in cognitively unimpaired. Plasma pTau181 was more strongly associated with both Aβ and tau PET. Plasma pTau181 was a more sensitive and specific predictor of elevated brain Aβ than total tau and was as good as, or better than, the combination of age and apolipoprotein E (APOE). Discussion: Plasma pTau181 may have utility as a biomarker of AD pathophysiology and as a noninvasive screener for elevated brain Aβ.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Blood measures of p-tau181, p-tau217, p-tau231, GFAP, NfL and Aβ42/40 have been shown to change in preclinical AD and can discriminate this state from CU individuals with non-AD pathological changes.

    “Indeed, blood measures of p-tau181, p-tau217, p-tau231, glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP), neurofilament light (NfL) and Aβ42/40 have been shown to change in preclinical AD and can discriminate this state from CU individuals with non-AD pathological changes1,3,6–13.”

    From Plasma p-tau231 and p-tau217 as state markers of amyloid-β pathology in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (2022) · cites this paper as [6]

    Results §3.2 and §3.5 report that plasma pTau181 was associated with elevated amyloid PET among cognitively unimpaired (CU) participants and had predictive value for elevated amyloid PET. However, Results §3.3 found no difference in mean pTau181 between CU amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative groups. The paper does not establish discrimination from CU individuals with non-AD pathological changes or assess the other biomarkers listed in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Few blood markers exist for the presymptomatic stage of Alzheimer's disease, though some progress has been reported for blood amyloid-β, tau, and NfL.

    “Blood biomarkers for the presymptomatic phase of Alzheimer’s disease are largely lacking, although recent progress in the analysis of amyloid-β, tau, and neurofilament light chain (NfL) in the blood have been reported5–10.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 621

Authors
Mielke, M. M., Hagen, C. E., Xu, J., Chai, X., Vemuri, P., Lowe, V. J., Airey, D. C., Knopman, D. S., Roberts, R. O., Machulda, M. M., Jack, C. R., Petersen, R. C., & Dage, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Mielke, Michelle M.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-04
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
989-997
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2795642715
Cited by
621
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 8
FWCI
42.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-15-1)
  • GE Healthcare
  • Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 AG011378, U01 HL096917, U01 AG024904, RO1 AG041851, R01 AG037551, R01 AG043392, U01 AG006786, P50 AG016574)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Phosphorylation, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Positron-Emission Tomography, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review