Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 420

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Simulator Training for Laparoscopic Suturing Using Performance Goals Translates to the Operating Room

Korndorffer, James R., Dunne, J. Bruce, Sierra, Rafael, Stefanidis, Dimitris, Touchard, Cheri L., Scott, Daniel J.·2005·Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop a performance-based laparoscopic suturing curriculum using simulators and to test the effectiveness (transferability) of the curriculum. STUDY DESIGN: Surgical residents (PGY1 to PGY5, n = 17) proficient in basic skills, but with minimal laparoscopic suturing experience, were enrolled in an IRB-approved, randomized controlled protocol. Subjects viewed an instructional video and were pretested on a live porcine laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication model by placing three gastrogastric sutures tied in an intracorporeal fashion. A blinded rater objectively scored each knot based on a previously published formula (600 minus completion time [sec] minus penalties for accuracy and knot integrity errors). Subjects were stratified according to pretest scores and randomized. The trained group practiced on a videotrainer suturing model until an expert-derived proficiency score (512) was achieved on 12 attempts. The control group received no training. Both the trained and control groups were posttested on the porcine Nissen model. RESULTS: For the training group, mean time to demonstrate simulator proficiency was 151 minutes (range 107 to 224 minutes) and mean number of attempts was 37 (range 24 to 51 attempts). Both the trained and control groups demonstrated significant improvement in overall score from baseline. But the trained group performed significantly better than the control group at posttesting (389 +/- 70 versus 217 +/- 140, p < 0.001), confirming curriculum effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that training to a predetermined expert level on a videotrainer suture model provides trainees with skills that translate into improved operative performance. Such curricula should be further developed and implemented as a means of ensuring proficiency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.021

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 420

Metadata

Authors
Korndorffer, J. R., Dunne, J. B., Sierra, R., Stefanidis, D., Touchard, C. L., & Scott, D. J.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2005-07
Volume
201
Issue
1
Pages
23-29
ISSN
1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983790524
Cited by
420
References
0
FWCI
21.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulator Training for Laparoscopic Suturing Using Performance Goals Translates to the Operating Room. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.021
The paper
Korndorffer, J. R., Dunne, J. B., Sierra, R., Stefanidis, D., Touchard, C. L., & Scott, D. J. (2005). Simulator Training for Laparoscopic Suturing Using Performance Goals Translates to the Operating Room. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.