The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effective Surgical Residents Strongly Influence Medical Students to Pursue Surgical Careers
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data about the influence of surgical residents on the career choices of medical students. We hypothesized that medical students exposed to effective surgical residents would be more likely to pursue careers in surgery. STUDY DESIGN: From 1998 to 2003, 108 surgical residents were evaluated by medical students rotating on the third-year clerkship. Residents were scored on a 4-point scale (1 = outstanding to 4 = poor). The career choices of all medical students were also tabulated. RESULTS: We examined 2,632 evaluations on 108 residents. Medical students who eventually pursued surgical residency training were exposed to surgical residents who were more effective clinical teachers, role models, and overall residents. In addition, medical students exposed to the highest-rated residents were more likely to pursue surgical residency training compared with students exposed to the least effective residents (12% versus 4.9%, p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that surgical residents who are effective educators and mentors influence medical students to pursue surgical careers. Efforts to provide more leadership and teaching workshops to surgical residents may not only create better future surgeon educators, but may also increase the number of students pursuing surgical training.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Residents in general surgery can be excellent educators and mentors and can influence medical students pursuing a general surgery career.
“Residents in general surgery can be excellent educators and mentors and can influence medical students pursuing a general surgery career [25].”
From How Can We Reduce Attrition in General Surgery Residents? (2018) · cites this paper as [25]
Surgery residents can be great mentors.
“Surgery residents can be great mentors [25].”
From How Can We Reduce Attrition in General Surgery Residents? (2018) · cites this paper as [25]
Surgery residents with less confidence are more likely to pursue postgraduate fellowships for additional training.
“Surgery residents with less confidence are more likely to pursue postgraduate fellowships for additional training [25].”
From How Can We Reduce Attrition in General Surgery Residents? (2018) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How Can We Reduce Attrition in General Surgery Residents?
DM, A. (2018) · Austin Journal of Surgery · doi:10.26420/austinjsurg.2018.1129 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Musunuru, S., Lewis, B., Rikkers, L. F., & Chen, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Herbert
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 204
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 164-167
- ISSN
- 1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966318646
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Surgeons (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Keywords
- surgical residents, medical students, career choice, surgical residency training, clinical teaching, mentoring, role models, clinical rotations, surgical training
- MeSH terms
- Career Choice, Humans, Internship and Residency, Retrospective Studies, Students, Medical, General Surgery, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review