The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: The Importance of This Emerging Stage of Disease
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) include those with localized disease who have tumor or patient characteristics that preclude immediate surgery. There is no optimal treatment schema for this distinct stage of disease, so the role of surgery is undefined. STUDY DESIGN: We defined patients with borderline resectable PA as fitting into one of three distinct groups. Group A comprised patients with tumor abutment of the visceral arteries or short-segment occlusion of the Superior Mesenteric Vein. In group B, patients had findings suggestive but not diagnostic of metastasis. Group C patients were of marginal performance status. Patients were treated initially with chemotherapy, chemoradiation, or both; those of sufficient performance status who completed preoperative therapy without disease progression were considered for surgery. RESULTS: Between October 1999 and August 2006, 160 (7%) of 2,454 patients with PA were classified as borderline resectable. Of these, 125 (78%) completed preoperative therapy and restaging, and 66 (41%) underwent pancreatectomy. Vascular resection was required in 18 (27%) of 66 patients, and 62 (94%) underwent a margin-negative pancreatectomy. A partial pathologic response to induction therapy (< 50% viable tumor) was seen in 37 (56%) of 66 patients. Median survival was 40 months for the 66 patients who completed all therapy and 13 months for the 94 patients who did not undergo pancreatectomy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large report of borderline resectable PA and includes objective definitions for this stage of disease. Our neoadjuvant approach allowed for identification of the marked subset of patients that was most likely to benefit from surgery, as evidenced by the favorable median survival in this group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hidalgo, M. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0901557 · Cited by 2,570
Allenson, K., Castillo, J., San Lucas, F. A., Scelo, G., Kim, D. U., Bernard, V., Davis, G., Kumar, T., Katz, M., Overman, M. J., et al. (2017) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx004 · Cited by 493
Self-citationVaradhachary, G. R., Wolff, R. A., Crane, C. H., Sun, C. C., Lee, J. E., Pisters, P. W. T., Vauthey, J.-N., Abdalla, E., Wang, H., Staerkel, G. A., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.15.8642 · Cited by 466
Self-citationNeoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer
Springfeld, C., Ferrone, C. R., Katz, M. H. G., Philip, P. A., Hong, T. S., Hackert, T., Büchler, M. W., & Neoptolemos, J. (2023) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-023-00746-1 · Cited by 377
Self-citationCloyd, J. M., Wang, H., Egger, M. E., Tzeng, C.-W. D., Prakash, L. R., Maitra, A., Varadhachary, G. R., Shroff, R., Javle, M., Fogelman, D., et al. (2017) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2227 · Cited by 112
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Katz, M. H. G., Pisters, P. W. T., Evans, D. B., Sun, C. C., Lee, J. E., Fleming, J. B., Vauthey, N. J., Abdalla, E. K., Crane, C. H., Wolff, R. A., Varadhachary, G. R., & Hwang, R. F.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 206
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 833-846
- ISSN
- 1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044211072
- Cited by
- 827
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: The Importance of This Emerging Stage of Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.020
- The paper
- Katz, M. H. G., Pisters, P. W. T., Evans, D. B., Sun, C. C., Lee, J. E., Fleming, J. B., Vauthey, N. J., Abdalla, E. K., Crane, C. H., Wolff, R. A., Varadhachary, G. R., & Hwang, R. F. (2008). Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: The Importance of This Emerging Stage of Disease. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.