Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 827

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: The Importance of This Emerging Stage of Disease

Open access
Katz, Matthew H.G., Pisters, Peter W.T., Evans, Douglas B., Sun, Charlotte C., Lee, Jeffrey E., Fleming, Jason B., Vauthey, Nicolas J., Abdalla, Eddie K., Crane, Christopher H., Wolff, Robert A., Varadhachary, Gauri R., Hwang, Rosa F.·2008·Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) include those with localized disease who have tumor or patient characteristics that preclude immediate surgery. There is no optimal treatment schema for this distinct stage of disease, so the role of surgery is undefined. STUDY DESIGN: We defined patients with borderline resectable PA as fitting into one of three distinct groups. Group A comprised patients with tumor abutment of the visceral arteries or short-segment occlusion of the Superior Mesenteric Vein. In group B, patients had findings suggestive but not diagnostic of metastasis. Group C patients were of marginal performance status. Patients were treated initially with chemotherapy, chemoradiation, or both; those of sufficient performance status who completed preoperative therapy without disease progression were considered for surgery. RESULTS: Between October 1999 and August 2006, 160 (7%) of 2,454 patients with PA were classified as borderline resectable. Of these, 125 (78%) completed preoperative therapy and restaging, and 66 (41%) underwent pancreatectomy. Vascular resection was required in 18 (27%) of 66 patients, and 62 (94%) underwent a margin-negative pancreatectomy. A partial pathologic response to induction therapy (< 50% viable tumor) was seen in 37 (56%) of 66 patients. Median survival was 40 months for the 66 patients who completed all therapy and 13 months for the 94 patients who did not undergo pancreatectomy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large report of borderline resectable PA and includes objective definitions for this stage of disease. Our neoadjuvant approach allowed for identification of the marked subset of patients that was most likely to benefit from surgery, as evidenced by the favorable median survival in this group.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.020

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 827

Metadata

Authors
Katz, M. H. G., Pisters, P. W. T., Evans, D. B., Sun, C. C., Lee, J. E., Fleming, J. B., Vauthey, N. J., Abdalla, E. K., Crane, C. H., Wolff, R. A., Varadhachary, G. R., & Hwang, R. F.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2008-05
Volume
206
Issue
5
Pages
833-846
ISSN
1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044211072
Cited by
827
References
0
FWCI
16.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: The Importance of This Emerging Stage of Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.020
The paper
Katz, M. H. G., Pisters, P. W. T., Evans, D. B., Sun, C. C., Lee, J. E., Fleming, J. B., Vauthey, N. J., Abdalla, E. K., Crane, C. H., Wolff, R. A., Varadhachary, G. R., & Hwang, R. F. (2008). Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: The Importance of This Emerging Stage of Disease. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.