The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fast Track Program in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: Results in 362 Consecutive Patients
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This article outlines our current perioperative management of patients undergoing cystectomy and urinary diversion using advancements in perioperative care to allow for early institution of an oral diet and early hospital discharge. STUDY DESIGN: Three hundred sixty-two consecutive patients underwent radical cystectomy and urinary diversion with curative intent (2001 through 2008). Each underwent a perioperative care plan ("fast track" program). Throughout our experience, evidence-based modifications to this program were instituted. We analyzed the impact of these modifications and report the outcomes with the most recent 100 patients in whom no additional modification has been used. RESULTS: Mean age of patients is 66.3 years, with 44% of the patients older than age 70 years and 12% older than age 80 years. We found no detrimental effects to immediate removal of the orogastric tube at the end of the procedure, but found a beneficial effect of empiric metoclopramide use, with lower rates of nausea and vomiting. Perioperative antibiotic coverage has been reduced to 24 hours as per American Urological Association guidelines. Gum-chewing has also been shown to be of benefit with regard to a more rapid recovery of bowel function. Use of nonnarcotic analgesics (eg, ketrolac) has also been central in the pathway. Finally, early institution of an oral diet has been an original and central component to our fast track program. CONCLUSIONS: Successful application of a fast track program has been applied to our patients undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion, with the potential to use evidence-based modifications to reduce morbidity and improve recovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols: Time to change practice?
Melnyk, M., Casey, R. G., Black, P., & Koupparis, A. J. (2011) · Canadian Urological Association Journal · doi:10.5489/cuaj.11002 · Cited by 384
Azhar, R. A., Bochner, B., Catto, J., Goh, A. C., Kelly, J., Patel, H. D., Pruthi, R. S., Thalmann, G. N., & Desai, M. (2016) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.051 · Cited by 299
Self-citationCasarin, M., Fortunato, T. M., Imran, S., Todesco, M., Sandrin, D., Borile, G., Toniolo, I., Marchesan, M., Gerosa, G., Bagno, A., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23052826 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Pruthi, R. S., Nielsen, M., Smith, A., Nix, J., Schultz, H., & Wallen, E. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 210
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-99
- ISSN
- 1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146995189
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast Track Program in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: Results in 362 Consecutive Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.026
- The paper
- Pruthi, R. S., Nielsen, M., Smith, A., Nix, J., Schultz, H., & Wallen, E. M. (2010). Fast Track Program in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: Results in 362 Consecutive Patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.