The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Implementation Guide for Rapid Integration of an Outpatient Telemedicine Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, social distancing has been necessary to help prevent disease transmission. As a result, medical practices have limited access to in-person visits. This poses a challenge to maintain appropriate patient care while preventing a substantial backlog of patients once stay-at-home restrictions are lifted. In practices that are naïve to telehealth as an alternative option, providers and staff are experiencing challenges with telemedicine implementation. We aim to provide a comprehensive guide on how to rapidly integrate telemedicine into practice during a pandemic. METHODS: We built a toolkit that details the following 8 essential components to successful implementation of a telemedicine platform: provider and staff training, patient education, an existing electronic medical record system, patient and provider investment in hardware, billing and coding integration, information technology support, audiovisual platforms, and patient and caregiver participation. RESULTS: Rapid integration of telemedicine in our practice was required to be compliant with our institution's COVID-19 task force. Within 3 days of this declaration, our large specialty-care clinic converted to a telemedicine platform and we completed 638 visits within the first month of implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Effective and efficient integration of a telemedicine program requires extensive staff and patient education, accessory platforms to facilitate video and audio communication, and adoption of new billing codes that are outlined in this toolkit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
Flodgren, G., Rachas, A., Farmer, A. J., Inzitari, M., & Shepperd, S. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002098.pub2 · Cited by 806
Development of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ)
Parmanto, B., Lewis, Jr., Graham, K. M., & Bertolet, M. H. (2016) · International Journal of Telerehabilitation · doi:10.5195/ijt.2016.6196 · Cited by 624 · cited 1×
“We are currently in the process of objectively determining patient-specific barriers to telemedicine appointments, as well as patient satisfaction using a validated telemedicine survey questionnaire.(22) Our anecdotal experience is that patients who are older and less educated require significantly more nursing or off…”
Cited by
Golinelli, D., Boetto, E., Carullo, G., Nuzzolese, A. G., Landini, M. P., & Fantini, M. P. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/22280 · Cited by 574
Ferraris, K. P., Golidtum, J. P., Zuñiga, B. K. W., Bautista, M. C. G., Alcazaren, J. C., Seng, K., & Navarro, J. E. (2020) · Neurosurgical Focus · doi:10.3171/2020.9.focus20695 · Cited by 16
The emergence of telemedicine in a low-middle-income country: challenges and opportunities.
(2024) · doi:10.3332/ecancer.2024.1679 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, W. R., Atala, A. J., Terlecki, R. P., Kelly, E. E., & Matthews, C. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 231
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 216-222e2
- ISSN
- 1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3021339548
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implementation Guide for Rapid Integration of an Outpatient Telemedicine Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.04.030
- The paper
- Smith, W. R., Atala, A. J., Terlecki, R. P., Kelly, E. E., & Matthews, C. A. (2020). Implementation Guide for Rapid Integration of an Outpatient Telemedicine Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.04.030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.