Meal Rounds: An Essential Aspect of Quality Nutrition Services in Long-term Care
Abstract
Introduction and rationale Weight change and, specifically, weight loss are common in residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs). The occurrence of weight change results from multifactorial processes, some of which can be considered nutrition risk factors. Meal rounds can be a continuous quality improvement activity to readily identify nutrition risk factors that can influence weight change. Methods This brief report will describe the activity of meal rounds and how they can be used to improve nutrition services. Baseline data from a previously published study on 37 residents will provide proportions of nutrition risk factors identified during meal rounds that can influence weight change. Outcomes Feeding and eating difficulties are prevalent in residents with dementia (eg, agitation 29.7%, resisting assistance 21.6%). Early identification of these difficulties using meal rounds may be a means of preventing weight change and promoting quality nutrition care in LTCFs. The proposed intervention of meal rounds conducted as described can improve the quality of nutrition services in LTCFs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In institutionalized older people, eating and feeding problems are widespread.
“In institutionalized older people, J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f eating and feeding problems are widespread and should also be identified, e.g. by informal observation during meals, and eliminated as far as possible by appropriate remedial actions (58).”
From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [58]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics
Volkert, D., Beck, A. M., Cederholm, T., Cruz-Jentoft, A., Hooper, L., Kiesswetter, E., Maggio, M., Raynaud-Simon, A., Sieber, C., Sobotka, L., et al. (2022) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2022.01.024 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
- Authors
- Keller, H. H., Gibbs-Ward, A., Randall-Simpson, J., Bocock, M.-A., & Dimou, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Guelph (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Keller, Heather H.
- ORCID
- Keller, Heather H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-45
- ISSN
- 1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111422738
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 7.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
- Keywords
- long-term care, nutrition services, weight change, weight loss, dementia, agitation, quality improvement, continuous quality improvement
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Mental Disorders, Dementia, Food Services, Humans, Long-Term Care, Nursing Assessment, Nursing Homes, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Weight Loss, Geriatric Assessment, Nutrition Assessment, Prevalence, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Total Quality Management, Risk Assessment, Observation, Early Diagnosis, Malnutrition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review