Cited by 90Dysphagia Assessment and ManagementNutrition and Health in AgingGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Dietary and Fluid Intakes of Older Adults in Care Homes Requiring a Texture Modified Diet: The Role of Snacks

Bannerman, Elaine, McDermott, Karen·2011·Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Abstract

Objective To evaluate and compare energy, protein, non-starch polysaccharide, and fluid intakes of a care home population consuming a texture modified diet (TMD) with those on a standard diet and also to evaluate the role of snacks in individuals' diets. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Care homes. Participants Thirty residents (n = 15 requiring standard diet: n = 15 requiring TMD). Measurements Dietary intakes were assessed using a 3-day weighed plate-wastage method. All snacks and drinks consumed were observed and recorded. Weights of standard portions and volumes were used to determine actual amounts consumed of these items. Estimated intakes were converted to energy and nutrient intakes using WinDiets Dietary analysis software. Results Residents on a TMD had significantly lower intakes of energy (1312 [326] kcal versus 1569 [260] kcal, P Conclusions These results suggest that dietary and fluid intakes of older adults in care homes requiring a TMD are significantly less than individuals on a standard texture diet. These are unlikely to be meeting individuals' dietary and nutritional needs. Strategies that maximize provision of appetizing energy and nutrient-dense foods (including snacks) and fluids of suitable textures require further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.06.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Insufficient dietary intake is described in older persons with dysphagia receiving texture-modified diets.

    “Nevertheless, insufficient dietary intake is described in older persons with dysphagia receiving texture-modified diets (20)(21)(22)107).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 15 · Cited by 90

Authors
Bannerman, E., & McDermott, K.
Affiliations
Queen Margaret University (GB)
Corresponding author
Bannerman, Elaine
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
234-239
ISSN
1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978862923
Cited by
90
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
texture-modified diets, nursing home residents, older adults, dietary intake, fluid intake, snacks, energy intake, protein intake, non-starch polysaccharides, nutritional adequacy, food texture
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Energy Intake, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Dietary Proteins, Drinking, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Homes, Nutritional Requirements, Polysaccharides, Scotland, Software, Geriatric Assessment, Nutrition Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review