Dietary and Fluid Intakes of Older Adults in Care Homes Requiring a Texture Modified Diet: The Role of Snacks
Abstract
Objective To evaluate and compare energy, protein, non-starch polysaccharide, and fluid intakes of a care home population consuming a texture modified diet (TMD) with those on a standard diet and also to evaluate the role of snacks in individuals' diets. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Care homes. Participants Thirty residents (n = 15 requiring standard diet: n = 15 requiring TMD). Measurements Dietary intakes were assessed using a 3-day weighed plate-wastage method. All snacks and drinks consumed were observed and recorded. Weights of standard portions and volumes were used to determine actual amounts consumed of these items. Estimated intakes were converted to energy and nutrient intakes using WinDiets Dietary analysis software. Results Residents on a TMD had significantly lower intakes of energy (1312 [326] kcal versus 1569 [260] kcal, P Conclusions These results suggest that dietary and fluid intakes of older adults in care homes requiring a TMD are significantly less than individuals on a standard texture diet. These are unlikely to be meeting individuals' dietary and nutritional needs. Strategies that maximize provision of appetizing energy and nutrient-dense foods (including snacks) and fluids of suitable textures require further investigation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Insufficient dietary intake is described in older persons with dysphagia receiving texture-modified diets.
“Nevertheless, insufficient dietary intake is described in older persons with dysphagia receiving texture-modified diets (20)(21)(22)107).”
From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [20]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 15 · Cited by 90
- Authors
- Bannerman, E., & McDermott, K.
- Affiliations
- Queen Margaret University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bannerman, Elaine
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 234-239
- ISSN
- 1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978862923
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (acceptedVersion)
- Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Keywords
- texture-modified diets, nursing home residents, older adults, dietary intake, fluid intake, snacks, energy intake, protein intake, non-starch polysaccharides, nutritional adequacy, food texture
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Energy Intake, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Dietary Proteins, Drinking, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Homes, Nutritional Requirements, Polysaccharides, Scotland, Software, Geriatric Assessment, Nutrition Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review