Reasons for institutionalization of people with dementia: informal caregiver reports from 8 European countries
Open accessAbstract
Objectives To explore reasons for institutionalization of people with dementia according to informal caregivers as well as variation in reasons between countries.Design An explorative cross-sectional study was conducted in 8 European countries.Setting Per country, a minimum of 3 long term care facilities, offering care and accommodation as a package, participated in this study. Participating countries were selected to represent different geographic areas in Europe.Participants Of the 791 informal caregivers involved in the RightTimePlaceCare project of people with dementia who were recently admitted to a long term care facility, 786 were included for this study.Measurements As part of a semistructured interview, informal caregivers were asked the main reason for institutionalization in an open-ended question. Answers were categorized according to a conventional coding approach. All reasons were then quantified and tested.Results Mainly patient-related reasons were stated, such as neuropsychiatric symptoms (25%), care dependency (24%), and cognition (19%). Neuropsychiatric symptoms were among the most often mentioned reasons in most countries. Besides patient-related reasons, caregiver burden and the inability of the informal caregiver to care for the patient were stated as reasons (both 15%). Further analyses showed countries differ significantly in reasons according to informal caregivers. Additionally, reasons were analyzed for spouses and child-caregivers, showing that spouses more often stated reasons related to themselves compared with child-caregivers.Conclusion Multiple reasons contribute to the institutionalization for people with dementia, with several factors that may influence why there were country differences. Variation in the organization of dementia care and cultural aspects, or the relationship between the informal caregiver and person with dementia may be factors influencing the reasons. Because of a wide variation in reasons between countries, no one-size-fits-all approach can be offered to guide informal caregivers when facing the possibility of institutionalization of the person with dementia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Limits on home care service and family availability were associated with long-term care placement.
“Consistent with the literature [35–37], limits on home care service and family availability were associated with LTC placement.”
From Towards defining quality in home care for persons living with dementia (2022) · cites this paper as [36]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 230
- Authors
- Afram, B., Stephan, A., Verbeek, H., Bleijlevens, M. H. C., Suhonen, R., Sutcliffe, C., Raamat, K., Cabrera, E., Soto, M. E., Hallberg, I. R., Meyer, G., & Hamers, J. P. H.
- Affiliations
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (NL)
- Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
- University of Turku (FI)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- University of Tartu (EE)
- TecnoCampus (ES)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR)
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Afram, Basema
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 108-116
- ISSN
- 1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984250535
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 11.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lup.lub.lu.se
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Keywords
- dementia, institutionalization, long-term care facilities, informal caregivers, reasons for institutionalization, neuropsychiatric symptoms, caregiver burden, care dependency, cross-national variation, child caregivers
- MeSH terms
- Accidental Falls, Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dementia, Europe, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Institutionalization, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Homes, Social Support, Caregivers, Cost of Illness, Spouses, Adult Children
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review