Cited by 365Nutrition and Health in AgingMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrailty in Older Adults

Interventions for Treating Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies

Yoshimura, Yoshihiro, Wakabayashi, Hidetaka, Yamada, Minoru, Kim, Hunkyung, Harada, Atsushi, Arai, Hidenori·2017·Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Abstract

Background Much interest has been focused on interventions for treating sarcopenia; however, the effects have gained little evidence.Objective To analyze the effectiveness of exercise, nutritional, drug, and combinational interventions for treating sarcopenia in older people.Method We systematically searched MEDLINE via PubMed, the Cochrane Library of Cochrane Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Ichushi-Web for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from January 2000 to December 2016. We have assessed the type of intervention, the cohort used, the way sarcopenia was diagnosed, the outcomes, and the quality of evidence. We meta-analyzed the outcomes with the net difference between-group treatment from baseline to the end of the study.Results We screened a total of 2668 records and included seven RCTs that investigated the effects of exercise (4 RCTs), nutrition (5 RCTs), drug (1 RCT), and combination (4 RCTs) on muscle mass, strength, and function in older people with sarcopenia. Very low to low-quality evidence suggests that (1) exercise interventions may play a role in improving muscle mass, muscle strength, and walking speed in 3 months of intervention; (2) nutritional interventions may be effective in improving muscle strength in 3 months of intervention; (3) as drug intervention, selective androgen receptor modulator had no clear effect on muscle mass, strength, and physical function; and (4) a combined intervention of exercise and nutrition may have positive effects in improving the walking speed in 3 months of intervention.Conclusion Our systematic review and meta-analysis showed some positive effects of exercise and nutritional interventions for treating sarcopenia in older people, although the quality of the evidence was low. Future high-quality RCTs should be implemented to strengthen the results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.03.019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 365

Authors
Yoshimura, Y., Wakabayashi, H., Yamada, M., Kim, H., Harada, A., & Arai, H.
Affiliations
  • Kumamoto Rehabilitation Hospital (JP)
  • Yokohama City University Medical Center (JP)
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (JP)
  • National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (JP)
Corresponding author
Arai, Hidenori
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
553.e1-553.e16
ISSN
1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2617764165
Cited by
365
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17H02187, 26282201, 16H05921, 16K13038, 16H06325)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
sarcopenia, older adults, exercise intervention, dietary intervention, selective androgen receptor modulators, muscle mass, muscle strength, physical function, walking speed, combined intervention
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review