Cited by 11Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Clinical practice guideline for diabetes management in the post-acute and long-term care setting

Open access
Davidson, H. Edward, Jain, Sakshi, Kazdan, Carolyn, Resnick, Barbara, Scarabelli, Tiziano, Pandya, Naushira·2024·Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Abstract

The newly revised Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for Diabetes Management in the Post-Acute and Long-Term Care (PALTC) Setting is an extremely useful resource that incorporates new evidence and perspectives related to overall goals in diabetes care. The CPG provides detailed information in usable Tables for how to use and manage the increasing number of medication alternatives for PALTC patients with diabetes. In addition, the CPG addresses the critical roles of all members of the interprofessional team for the optimal management of older adults living with diabetes. The primary goal of care as described in the CPG is to make diabetes management individualized and consistent with the patient's/resident's goals of care, and to optimize quality of life and the ability to live in the least restrictive setting possible. To achieve this, the CPG emphasizes the importance of understanding the patients' overall health status, what their preferences and values are, their life expectancy, the clinical benefit of tight versus more liberal control of glucose, risk of hypoglycemia, and impact of treatment on quality of life and ability to live in a certain setting of care (e.g., if injectable therapy is possible). As with other PALTmed CPGs, this new CPG takes the team through the process of recognition, assessment, treatment and monitoring. Implementation of the Diabetes Management in PALTC Settings CPG can help those working in these settings ensure that their patients and residents are getting the most appropriate and current evidence-based treatment for this challenging clinical problem.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105342

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transitions to acute care and long-term care can lead to discontinuity in goals of care, errors in dosing, and changes in nutrition and activity.

    “Unfortunately, these transitions can lead to discontinuity in goals of care, errors in dosing, and changes in nutrition and activity (135).”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [135]

    The abstract (page not available) discusses aligning diabetes management with patients’ goals of care, but does not describe harms from transitions between care settings. Searches for transitions, dosing errors, and changes in nutrition or activity found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed effects. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Transitions to post-acute and long-term care can lead to discontinuity in goals of care, errors in dosing, and changes in nutrition and activity.

    “these transitions can lead to discontinuity in goals of care, errors in dosing, and changes in nutrition and activity”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [153]

    The abstract (page not provided) discusses aligning diabetes management with residents’ goals of care, but does not say that transitions disrupt those goals. Searches for transitions, dosing errors, and changes in nutrition or activity found no passage in our copy addressing those effects. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davidson, H. E., Jain, S., Kazdan, C., Resnick, B., Scarabelli, T., & Pandya, N.
Affiliations
  • Insight Therapeutics (US)
  • Hackensack University Medical Center (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Nova Southeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Pandya, Naushira
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
105342
ISSN
1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403326495
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
diabetes management, post-acute care, long-term care, older adults, multidisciplinary team, goals of care, individualized care, hypoglycemia risk, glycemic control, quality of life, medication alternatives, evidence-based practice
MeSH terms
Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Long-Term Care, Quality of Life, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Subacute Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review