Cited by 103Dental Health and Care UtilizationObesity, Physical Activity, DietNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Dietary Intake and Severe Early Childhood Caries in Low-Income, Young Children

Open access
Evans, E. Whitney, Hayes, Catherine, Palmer, Carole A., Bermudez, Odilia I., Cohen, Steven A., Must, Aviva·2013·Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

Evidence suggests that risk for early childhood caries (ECCs), the most common chronic infectious disease in childhood, is increased by specific eating behaviors. To identify whether consumption of added sugars, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), and 100% fruit juice, as well as eating frequency, are associated with severe ECCs, cross-sectional data collected from a sample of low-income, racially diverse children aged 2 to 6 years were used. Four hundred fifty-four children with severe ECCs and 429 caries-free children were recruited in 2004-2008 from three pediatric dental clinics in Columbus, OH; Cincinnati, OH; and Washington, DC. Dietary data were obtained from one parent-completed 24-hour recall and an interviewer-administered food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess associations between severe ECCs and dietary variables. On average, children with severe ECCs consumed 3.2-4.8 fl oz more SSBs (24-hour recall=1.80 vs 1.17; P< 0.001; FFQ=0.82 vs 0.39; P<0.001) and reported significantly more daily eating occasions (5.26 vs 4.72; P<0.0001) than caries-free children. After controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, maternal education, recruitment site, and family size, children with the highest SSB intake were 2.0 to 4.6 times more likely to have severe ECCs compared with those with the lowest intake, depending on dietary assessment method (24-hour recall odds ratio 2.02, 95% CI 1.33 to 3.06; FFQ odds ratio 4.63, 95% CI 2.86 to 7.49). The relationship between eating frequency and severe ECC status was no longer significant in multivariate analyses. Specific dietary guidance for parents of young children, particularly regarding SSB consumption, could help reduce severe ECC prevalence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jand.2013.03.014

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The vast majority of cross-sectional studies found evidence for a positive association between SSB consumption and dental caries.

    “The vast majority of cross-sectional studies found evidence for a positive association between SSB consumption and dental caries [67, 69–82].”
  • Several studies replicated the positive association between SSB consumption and dental caries among low-income children.

    “Several studies replicated this positive association among low-income children [70, 73, 75], with one study reporting that high SSB consumption (≥5 oz/day) was associated with a 4.6 greater odds of dental caries compared to those with lower SSB consumption [70].”
  • High SSB consumption (≥5 oz/day) was associated with a 4.6 greater odds of dental caries compared to lower SSB consumption.

    “Several studies replicated this positive association among low-income children [70, 73, 75], with one study reporting that high SSB consumption (≥5 oz/day) was associated with a 4.6 greater odds of dental caries compared to those with lower SSB consumption [70].”
  • The majority of studies examining SSB intake and dental caries are cross-sectional, with several longitudinal studies and one intervention study.

    “While the majority of studies examining SSB intake and dental caries are cross-sectional [67–82], there have been several longitudinal studies [83–88] and one intervention study [89].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 103

Authors
Evans, E. W., Hayes, C., Palmer, C. A., Bermudez, O. I., Cohen, S. A., & Must, A.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Health Resources in Action (US)
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
113
Issue
8
Pages
1057-1061
ISSN
2212-2672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085238797
Cited by
103
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R21DE018119)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
early childhood caries, sugar-sweetened beverages, added sugars, 100% fruit juice, meal frequency, dietary intake, low-income children, young children, caries risk factors, dietary assessment, 24-hour dietary recall, food frequency questionnaire
MeSH terms
Beverages, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dental Caries, Diet, Cariogenic, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food Preferences, Humans, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Socioeconomic Factors, Nutrition Assessment, Multivariate Analysis, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Dietary Sucrose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review