Cited by 153Dietetics, Nutrition, and EducationNutrition, Health, and Society StudiesNutrition and Health Studies

Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: The role of nutrition in health promotion and chronic disease prevention

Slawson, Deborah Leachman, Fitzgerald, Nurgul, Morgan, Kathleen T.·2013·Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

It is the position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics that primary prevention is the most effective and affordable method to prevent chronic disease, and that dietary intervention positively impacts health outcomes across the life span. Registered dietitians and dietetic technicians, registered are critical members of health care teams and are essential to delivering nutrition-focused preventive services in clinical and community settings, advocating for policy and programmatic initiatives, and leading research in disease prevention and health promotion. Health-promotion and disease-prevention strategies are effective at reducing morbidity and mortality and improving quality of life, and have a significant impact on the leading causes of disease. By applying these principles within a social ecological theoretical framework, positive influence can be applied across the spectrum of engagement: at intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional, community, and public policy levels. Through the application of efficacious and cost-effective interventions, registered dietitians and dietetic technicians, registered, can positively impact public health as well as health outcomes for the individuals that they counsel. This position paper supports the "Practice Paper of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: The Role of Nutrition in Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention" published on the Academy's website at: www.eatright.org/positions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jand.2013.05.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 93 · Cited by 153

Authors
Slawson, D. L., Fitzgerald, N., & Morgan, K. T.
Affiliations
  • East Tennessee State University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
113
Issue
7
Pages
972-979
ISSN
2212-2672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068153170
Cited by
153
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9
FWCI
16.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
nutrition, health promotion, chronic disease prevention, primary prevention, registered dietitians, socio-ecological model, dietary intervention, public health policy, healthcare teams
MeSH terms
Academies and Institutes, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Chronic Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Dietetics, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Life Style, Male, Motor Activity, Neoplasms, Nutritional Status, Obesity, Osteoporosis, Primary Prevention, Public Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review