Cited by 40Acne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsOvarian function and disordersDermatology and Skin Diseases

Differences in dietary glycemic load and hormones in New York city adults with no and moderate/severe acne

Burris, Jennifer, Rietkerk, William, Shikany, James M., Woolf, Kathleen·2017·Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

Background Glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) may be implicated in acne pathogenesis. Objective This cross-sectional study examined differences between GI/GL and biological factors associated with acne among adults with and without moderate/severe acne. Secondary objectives included examining differences between food-aggravated acne beliefs and acne-specific quality of life among adults with and without moderate/severe acne. Design As part of a cross-sectional study, participants completed a 5-day food record; blood draw to measure biological factors associated with acne (ie, glucose, insulin, insulin-like growth factor-1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3, and sex hormone-binding globulin concentrations); body composition assessment; and questionnaire to evaluate food-aggravated acne beliefs and acne-specific quality of life. Food records were analyzed using Nutrition Data Services for Research. Participants Sixty-four participants (no acne, n=32; moderate/severe acne, n=32) from New York City, NY, were included in this study. Statistical analysis Independent sample t tests and Mann-Whitney tests examined differences in anthropometric measurements, dietary intakes, biological factors associated with acne, insulin resistance, and acne-specific quality of life between acne groups. A χ 2 test for independence assessed differences in food-aggravated acne beliefs between acne groups. Results Participants with moderate/severe acne consumed greater total carbohyd…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jand.2017.03.024

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 17.9% (5/28) of observational studies exclusively assessed the association between GI/glycemic load and acne.

    “Overall, 17.9% (5/28) of the observational studies exclusively assessed the association between GI/glycemic load and acne (Table I).19, 20, 21, 22, 23”

    From Diet and acne: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burris, J., Rietkerk, W., Shikany, J. M., & Woolf, K.
Corresponding author
Burris, Jennifer
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
117
Issue
9
Pages
1375-1383
ISSN
2212-2672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2623419756
Cited by
40
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
acne, glycemic load, glycemic index, dietary carbohydrates, insulin, insulin resistance, insulin-like growth factor I, sex hormone-binding globulin
MeSH terms
Glycemic Load, Acne Vulgaris, Adult, Anthropometry, Blood Glucose, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Eating, Female, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Male, New York City, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Diet Records, Chi-Square Distribution, Statistics, Nonparametric, Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 1, Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review