Cited by 211Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Interoceptive awareness mediates the relationship between anxiety and the intensity of unpleasant feelings

Pollatos, Olga, Traut-Mattausch, Eva, Schroeder, Heike, Schandry, Rainer·2007·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between interoceptive awareness, anxiety, and the intensity of unpleasant feelings. The perception of visceral signals (interoceptive awareness) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders. Nevertheless, studies simultaneously investigating relationships between emotion processing, anxiety, and interoceptive awareness remain sparse. The present study was designed to elucidate the interrelations between these variables. Trait anxiety and interoceptive awareness were assessed in 102 healthy participants. Following this, neutral and unpleasant pictures were presented and subjects were asked to rate perceived emotional pleasantness and arousal. We found that both interoceptive awareness and trait anxiety were significantly positively correlated with mean arousal scores for unpleasant pictures. A positive relationship between interoceptive awareness and trait anxiety was also found. Subsequent regression analyses showed that the relationship between emotional arousal and trait anxiety was mediated by differences in interoceptive awareness. Our results highlight the possible role of interoceptive awareness in the development of trait anxiety and may have further implications for theoretical models of anxiety disorders and their treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.12.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 65 · Cited by 211

Authors
Pollatos, O., Traut-Mattausch, E., Schroeder, H., & Schandry, R.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Klinikum Ingolstadt (DE)
Corresponding author
Pollatos, Olga
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
931-943
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007633768
Cited by
211
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
interoceptive awareness, trait anxiety, emotional arousal, unpleasant pictures, mediation, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Arousal, Awareness, Emotions, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Somatoform Disorders, Statistics as Topic, Temperament

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review