Interoceptive awareness mediates the relationship between anxiety and the intensity of unpleasant feelings
Abstract
This study examined the relationship between interoceptive awareness, anxiety, and the intensity of unpleasant feelings. The perception of visceral signals (interoceptive awareness) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders. Nevertheless, studies simultaneously investigating relationships between emotion processing, anxiety, and interoceptive awareness remain sparse. The present study was designed to elucidate the interrelations between these variables. Trait anxiety and interoceptive awareness were assessed in 102 healthy participants. Following this, neutral and unpleasant pictures were presented and subjects were asked to rate perceived emotional pleasantness and arousal. We found that both interoceptive awareness and trait anxiety were significantly positively correlated with mean arousal scores for unpleasant pictures. A positive relationship between interoceptive awareness and trait anxiety was also found. Subsequent regression analyses showed that the relationship between emotional arousal and trait anxiety was mediated by differences in interoceptive awareness. Our results highlight the possible role of interoceptive awareness in the development of trait anxiety and may have further implications for theoretical models of anxiety disorders and their treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adaptive body awareness is positively associated with affect regulation.
“A growing body of research shows that this sort of adaptive body awareness is positively associated with affect regulation (Pollatos & Schandry, 2008; Pollatos, Traut‐Mattausch, Schroeder, & Schandry, 2007) and negatively associated with depression and rumination (Lackner & Fresco, 2016; Pollatos, Traut‐Mattausch, & Schandry, 2009).”
From A mindful yoga intervention for young women with major depressive disorder: Design and baseline sample characteristics of a randomized controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as Pollatos, Traut‐Mattausch, Schroeder, & Schandry, 2007
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 65 · Cited by 211
- Authors
- Pollatos, O., Traut-Mattausch, E., Schroeder, H., & Schandry, R.
- Affiliations
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Klinikum Ingolstadt (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Pollatos, Olga
- ORCID
- Pollatos, Olga
- Venue
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 931-943
- ISSN
- 0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007633768
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Keywords
- interoceptive awareness, trait anxiety, emotional arousal, unpleasant pictures, mediation, anxiety disorders
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Arousal, Awareness, Emotions, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Somatoform Disorders, Statistics as Topic, Temperament
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review