Cited by 177Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Social anxiety and the interpretation of positive social events

Alden, Lynn E., Taylor, Charles T., Mellings, Tanna M.J.B., Laposa, Judith M.·2008·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

We report four independent studies that examined the relationship between social interaction anxiety and the tendency to interpret positive social events in a threat-maintaining manner. Study 1 described the development of a scale that measures negative interpretations of positive social events, the interpretation of positive events scale (IPES). Study 2 cross-validated the structure of the IPES and established that social interaction anxiety explained significant variance in negative interpretations of positive social events beyond negative affect in general. Study 3 demonstrated that negative interpretation of positive events was significantly greater in a clinical sample of patients with generalized social anxiety disorder (GSAD) than a matched group of non-anxious community controls. In addition, within the GSAD group, the IPES was associated with negative social predictions following a positive interaction. Finally, study 4 confirmed that negative interpretations of positive social events mediated the relationship between social interaction anxiety and low positive affect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.05.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 177

Authors
Alden, L. E., Taylor, C. T., Mellings, T. M. J. B., & Laposa, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Alden, Lynn E.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
577-590
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032166919
Cited by
177
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
social anxiety, generalized social anxiety disorder, threat interpretation, positive affect, social interaction anxiety, social forecasting, negative affect, mediation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Anxiety Disorders, Culture, Depression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Male, Middle Aged, Perceptual Distortion, Personality Inventory, Phobic Disorders, Psychometrics, Social Perception, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review