Social anxiety and the interpretation of positive social events
Abstract
We report four independent studies that examined the relationship between social interaction anxiety and the tendency to interpret positive social events in a threat-maintaining manner. Study 1 described the development of a scale that measures negative interpretations of positive social events, the interpretation of positive events scale (IPES). Study 2 cross-validated the structure of the IPES and established that social interaction anxiety explained significant variance in negative interpretations of positive social events beyond negative affect in general. Study 3 demonstrated that negative interpretation of positive events was significantly greater in a clinical sample of patients with generalized social anxiety disorder (GSAD) than a matched group of non-anxious community controls. In addition, within the GSAD group, the IPES was associated with negative social predictions following a positive interaction. Finally, study 4 confirmed that negative interpretations of positive social events mediated the relationship between social interaction anxiety and low positive affect.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The tendency to interpret positive social events as threatening has been shown to partially mediate the relationship between social anxiety and decreased positive affect.
“This tendency to interpret positive social events as threatening has been shown to partially mediate the relationship between social anxiety and decreased positive affect (40).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 177
- Authors
- Alden, L. E., Taylor, C. T., Mellings, T. M. J. B., & Laposa, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Alden, Lynn E.
- Venue
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 577-590
- ISSN
- 0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032166919
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- social anxiety, generalized social anxiety disorder, threat interpretation, positive affect, social interaction anxiety, social forecasting, negative affect, mediation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Anxiety Disorders, Culture, Depression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Male, Middle Aged, Perceptual Distortion, Personality Inventory, Phobic Disorders, Psychometrics, Social Perception, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review