Cited by 88Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Measuring health anxiety: Moving past the dichotomous response option of the original Whiteley Index

Welch, Patrick G., Carleton, R. Nicholas, Asmundson, Gordon J.G.·2009·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

The Whiteley Index [WI; Pilowsky, I. (1967). Dimensions of hypochondriasis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 113, 89-93] is a widely used self-report measure of health anxiety, hypochondriasis, and illness phobia; however, the factor structure of the WI has proven unstable. Moreover, factorial investigations of the WI persist in the original true/false response format despite criticisms of dichotomous scales and the availability of a Likert scale version [Barsky, A. J., Cleary, P. D., Wyshak, G., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Klerman, G. L. (1992). A structured diagnostic interview for hypochondriasis: a proposed criterion standard. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 180, 20-27]. The current investigation explores the factor structure of the 5-point Likert scale version of the WI using a sample of 287 students (64 men, ages 18-34 [M=20.6; SD=3.2]; 223 women ages 18-45 [M=20.2; SD=3.2]) divided into two sex-matched groups. A 2-factor 8-item model was extracted from the first group using exploratory factor analysis. However, confirmatory factor analysis with the second group showed superior fit to the data using a precedent 2-factor 6-item model, demonstrating factorial invariance across response options. Comprehensive results, implications, and directions for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.05.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shortened versions of the Health Anxiety Inventory and Whitley Index 6 have been developed and widely used in clinical settings due to their practicality and brief nature.

    “A shortened version of the Health Anxiety Inventory [66] and Whitley Index 6 [68] have been developed and widely used in clinical settings due to their practicality and brief nature [69, 70].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 88

Authors
Welch, P. G., Carleton, R. N., & Asmundson, G. J. G.
Affiliations
University of Regina (CA)
Corresponding author
Asmundson, Gordon J.G.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
1002-1007
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003711732
Cited by
88
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Whiteley Index, health anxiety, factor structure, Likert scale, measurement invariance, self-report measures, confirmatory factor analysis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Culture, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Hypochondriasis, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review