Addressing revisions to the brief fear of negative evaluation scale: Measuring fear of negative evaluation across anxiety and mood disorders
Abstract
The fear of negative evaluation (FNE) represents a fundamental component of social anxiety and social anxiety disorder (SAD) within modern cognitive-behavioral models (Clark & Wells, 1995; Rapee & Heimberg, 1997). As such, access to comprehensive psychometrics for measures of FNE is an important component of thorough clinical and research efforts. Among the most popular measures of FNE have been variations of the 12-item Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation (BFNE) scale (Leary, 1983). There are currently three versions of the BFNE based on two psychometric studies (i.e., two 8-item variants and a 12-item variant). There is still substantial debate regarding which of the three alternatives should be used by researchers and clinicians. Normative data for each of the three alternatives are not available across samples of individuals with diagnosed anxiety and mood disorders; moreover, there has been no comparative assessment of responses for such samples. The present investigation was to provide more definitive recommendations about the three alternatives, to provide normative clinical data, and to explore differences in FNE endorsement across anxiety and mood disorders. Clinical participants included 381 individuals (60% women; age M=35.61, SD=12.49) from an established anxiety treatment and research center. Diagnoses included those with a principal diagnosis of SAD (32%), those with a diagnosis of SAD as an additional disorder (24%), those without a diagnosis of SAD (41%), and th…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The mean BFNE-II score for the sample at pre-treatment was 33.75, and 82% scored 25 or above, indicating most could fulfil criteria for social anxiety disorder.
“The mean score on the BFNE-II for the sample was 33.75, Carleton et al. (2011) suggest a score of 25 or above as an indicator of someone with clinically significant social anxiety. Scores of 25 or above were reported by 82% of the sample at pre, indicating that most of the sample could fulfil the criteria for social anxiety disorder.”
From An ACT self-help intervention for adults with a visible difference in appearance: A pilot feasibility and acceptability randomized controlled study. (2023) · cites this paper as Carleton et al. (2011)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 177
- Authors
- Carleton, R. N., Collimore, K. C., McCabe, R. E., & Antony, M. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Regina (CA)
- St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA)
- Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Carleton, R. Nicholas
- Venue
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 822-828
- ISSN
- 0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043935241
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 11.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- fear of negative evaluation, social anxiety disorder, anxiety disorders, mood disorders, reference values, psychometric properties, social anxiety
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, ROC Curve, Mood Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review