Functional impairment in social anxiety disorder
Abstract
The present study examined functional impairment among treatment seekers with social anxiety disorder (SAD). We investigated the effects of diagnostic subtypes of SAD and comorbidity with mood and anxiety disorders on impairment. In addition, we used cluster analysis procedures to empirically identify subgroups of individuals with distinct patterns of impairment. Participants were 216 treatment-seeking individuals with SAD. Clinical interviews were undertaken to determine diagnoses of anxiety disorders and major depressive disorder, and a battery of self-report measures was administered to index symptoms of social anxiety, depression and extent of impairment. Results indicated that individuals with the generalized subtype of SAD had greater impairment in all three life domains compared to individuals with the nongeneralized subtype. Comorbidity with mood disorders was associated with greater impairment than SAD alone, but comorbidity with anxiety disorders was not. Four distinct impairment profiles emerged from the cluster analysis: primary work/studies impairment, primary social life impairment, both work/studies and social impairment, and impairment in all domains. Findings from this study suggest that SAD is associated with substantial impairment across multiple domains, and that individuals with SAD present diverse impairment profiles. These profiles may inform subtyping of the disorder as well as therapeutic interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SAD could have a severe impact on individuals' educational attainment and ability to work productively and maintain social relationships.
“SAD could have a severe impact on individuals’ educational attainment and ability to work productively and maintain social relationships [9].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 76 · Cited by 343
- Authors
- Aderka, I. M., Hofmann, S. G., Nickerson, A., Hermesh, H., Gilboa-Schechtman, E., & Marom, S.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Geha Mental Health Center (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Aderka, Idan M.
- Venue
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 393-400
- ISSN
- 0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974800369
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 18.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH078308)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- social anxiety disorder, functional disability, generalized social anxiety, diagnostic subtypes, comorbidities, mood disorders, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, treatment-seeking patients
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review